Honestly this is the thing I worry the most. Without having encryption as a first class citizen, the ux of the notes will be sacrificed greatly. Simply because good encryption tends to be slow, making the app unproductive imo.

based

Was having that kind of idea. If you have any inputs about it, youre welcome to open a pr on treedome

Hmm if it comes to the age of a tech and its stability, I agree. I guess only time will tell. But do you have any suggestion for what this note taking format would look like? I personally think for non encrypted notes, foam’s implementation is on the right track.

the extension could cease to exist, but you can absolutely still access your notes with any text editor decades from now. I still don’t get where the “non-future proof” here. Can’t really be more future proof than a simple text file.

Arguably, open document format, although standardized, are harder to open and manage because it’s far more complex than a text file that ends with .md.

Its future proof tho? Markdown has a standard (or at least a common implementation) and foam is just a tool to automate and graph all the boring parts?

nice, im trying to update it on nixpkgs, will probably make 0.5.1 to fix dependencies stuff in master first tho

If you really want to be future proof and interoperable, I suggest you to use something like a git repository + vscode + foam (https://github.com/foambubble/foam). All of the tech is open source and relatively easy to use, especially if you already know git.

Treedome on the other hand can be abandoned. It can be swallowed by the sands of time. It uses a custom file format after all. But because of its open-source nature, as long as you have the code, you can open the notes. But that’s a good idea, to be able to export to a plaintext file. You could make a request here if you want https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/issues

Currently, using syncthing and occasionally pushing it to something like gdrive/mega/Dropbox is what I do

I found this, maybe a fork by someone? https://www.lemmyapps.com/app/details/33 The github link is alive btw

also there’s no plan to put this in android, yet. I still can’t imagine how it would end up.

Thank you! By 1 file means the entire document (filled with your notes) is contained within 1 file. It’s a .note file, custom-made, but based on sqlite file format. Currently I have no need to monetize the app (I want to keep it libre and free for this one), but you can contribute by filing bugs and fixing issues on the page https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/issues

as if on queue, I just released a new version of my own note taking app https://p.programming.dev/post/programming.dev/18265389

Its local so it’s as good as your HDD/SDD, its encrypted so no one can know the content beside yourself, and you can sync it however you want (its 1 file only).

is it this one https://bazzite.gg/? Does it have .deb support? Because if so, you can install it easily because i release it with .deb and nix. If not, you can always compile it yourself using the docs here https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/src/branch/master/docs/development/development-setup.md. Please make an issue in the repo if you have any suggestion on improving the docs.

nope, there are some differences (i use the one from my old posts):

• Not open source, treedome is open source.
• Uses a centralized server to sync your notes, treedome instead uses a single local file which you can sync, move around, however you want.
• Uses graph, treedome is working with trees and tagging instead.
• Uses plugins to add more feature to the notes, treedome doesn’t plan to do this. We at least want a complete experience out of the box, with notes files that’s fairly stable within a major version. I have to make it stable since the start because I’m already using it for work and personal.

You are welcome, please do tell about your experience tho, especially what you want to prioritize. Because for me, currently its feature complete.

If he think swift is the way to go, good for him. The code before swift is still open source, so interested user can fork it. What is there to hate?

really? how come? I thought they are mentioned because of the diffs if compared to master, which merge basically just… merge on top of my branch (?)

AAAH NOT LIKE THIS

Please for the love of god don’t use merge, especially in a crowded repository. Don’t be me and suffer the consequences. I mistakenly mention every person with a commit between the time I created the branch until current master.