Well I mentioned France, who are using nuclear as a backup to the rewables they implemented.

This study disagrees after taking into account storage.

https://advisoranalyst.com/2023/05/11/bofa-the-nuclear-necessity.html/

Storage and production of renewables is also done by shipping in Chinese products created burning coal and ignoring environmental concerns. This all hinges on exporting emissions and labor to areas that don’t care about pollution.

I’d also argue that nuclear tech can likely proceed faster than storage, given the dangerous nature of energy storage. Even something as basic as storing water can cause deaths given what happens when dams break, stored energy is volatile by nature.

Well wind farms won’t help, if you need 100% reliability. Storage I figured was more expensive than nuclear after adding all the costs together, creating enough hydro for backup is extremely expensive as well.

You’re essentially building a hydro power plant, water storage, pumps, and wind turbine at that point.

Why do you need to force industrial users off during the day, and how do you decommission your backup nuclear power with intermittent wind, when all you did was move from 100% uptime nuclear to variable uptime wind and solar?

I’m just saying if you really want to be green you’re building nuclear.

Making room for the intermittent nature of solar imposes upon the grid a large cost for backup power, adding to the levelized cost of electricity, yet this cost is never ascribed to the cost of the solar panel. The more solar you have the more idle backup power you need.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity

In France 70% of their power came from nuclear and they added renewables, they then need to throttle the nuclear power plants which is not an easy task, and they then make less money and require tax funded bailouts.

Well I mean for corporate use. Everything you use will be through a web browser and all the data will be stored on corporate servers.

It will all be Chromebooks and software as a service by then. Unless you work as a SaaS vendor, then it will be automatically orchestrating docker containers.

We don’t have open borders, so we already do disallow entry. We just used to match it to capacity, which is what I’m saying is logical to do.

So cram them into substandard housing because they deserve less rights than animals?

You’re not offering a tangible answer here, the argument is situational similarity, not ontological equivalence.

If you had a zoo would you continue bringing in animals if they had no space left to live comfortably?

Likely you would call that inhumane, you wouldnt say they were being intolerant of the new animals if they did not.

AI will fix this. Everyone will have nudes of everyone, and nobody will believe anything is real.

Even watching porn will be weird, when you can only assume what youre watching is a computer trying its best to not turn the womens bumhole into a picture of a dog.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/policing-speech-online-germany-60-minutes-transcript/

deleted by creator

Europe doesnt want federated services, they want censorship.

Saying that oil production lowers emissions by displacing coal will be called climate misinformation, saying immigration needs to be lower due to a housing crisis will be called hate speech, using Bitcoin instead of the digital euro will be called terrorist financing. They’re already arresting people who do something as benign as retweet things, its a slippery slope.

Firefox VPN is cheaper isn’t it, and funds the Firefox nonprofit?

I chose Rubrik because they didn’t offer Kerberos or any kind of PKI. Is the security better now?