The problem is that this rule gives a member’s judges direct power over another member’s courts and there’s no clear recourse against members that use this power to violate human rights in ways the member’s citizens would normally be protected from
The problem is that this rule gives a member’s judges direct power over another member’s courts and there’s no clear recourse against members that use this power to violate human rights in ways the member’s citizens would normally be protected from
every 20 lines… haha that’s so much… visibly sweating
coming from a conservative media outlet instantly tanks any claim’s credibility imo
but it seems that this method of communication completely drowned out by moneyed interests
I’ve done this! highly recommended
Yeah, I’m all for anonymity but the quality of the article is so poor it’s like it was published or boosted to undermine the position than actually promote it