• Banana@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    19 days ago

    Basically, it’s contextual and should be treated on a case by case basis, and that is why it must be legal for all, because these cases cannot be effectively foreseen.

    • FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      What context?

      It’s nobody else’s choice

      Nobody else is gestating the foetus, nobody else will potentially be squeezing it out of their body, to great cost

      The toll that pregnancy takes on women is woefully underestimated by almost everyone.

      Women lose teeth because the foetus parasitises their calcium to such a great extent

      There is no “context” other than being OK with forcing a woman to be an incubator

      I stand by my original statement

      The only reason a woman needs for an abortion is that she wants one.

      It’s that simple.

      • Banana@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        I wasn’t arguing with you, you misunderstood my point. I was just adding onto what you said.

        My point being: when we start to try to apply moral “code” to something as personal and nuanced as abortion, people always suffer because it’s so personal and nuanced.

        I am agreeing with you, it should be nobodys decision but the woman, because every woman’s situation (CONTEXT) is different, so there’s literally no way to apply some kind of blanket morality to abortions.

        The reason a woman might want one can change based on so many factors, so trying to dictate that women should only be able to get one when they’re needed requires defining situations where they’re needed, the thing is, though, if an abortion is wanted, then it is needed.

        I am agreeing with you.