• ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Same old broken record as with previous Fairphones.

    Their holier-than-thou attitude towards security backed them into the corner of being virtually unable to run GrapheneOS on any platform other than Google’s own Pixel phones, and now Google is pulling the rug from under them.

    The GrapheneOS people were tedious when Micay was there, and they haven’t really changed.

    • Ilandar@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t really mind that GrapheneOS excludes other manufacturers/devices based on their extremely strict requirements, it’s good to have a tighter option for those who want it. Their team has always been unnecessarily antagonistic/hostile towards other projects in this space, though. The way they communicate publicly is always so extreme and deliberately lacking in context so that everything is framed as “GrapheneOS = good, competitors = bad”. They won’t acknowledge differing threat models to their own and treat everyone else as a bad actor or a clueless moron, which has led to this very weird cult mentality among the userbase. So many people shill the absolute fuck out of this project online yet have never put any thought into what their personal threat model is or what features they actually want in a custom OS. They don’t even know why they installed GrapheneOS, they just read comments from other people on social media or watched a YouTube video and blindly followed along.