• glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    gOS threat model is “everything everywhere all at once” - nation state actors et al - and from that standpoint, yeah, eOS and lOS and whoever else is lacking.

    but the vast majority of users have a threat model that can be boiled down to two things:

    1. a lost/stolen device doesn’t compromise me - the fucker can’t get at my stuff and/or impersonate me, and
    2. free from apple’s/google’s reign - I control what stuff runs on my phone

    both easily accomplished with lineageOS and derivatives running on a $50 phone. if you truly want to spend four digits annually on Newest & Best, you do you, I’m good.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      e/OS is just particularly egregious. This isn’t about GrapheneOS being paranoid, it’s Murena not delivering the most basic level of security patches, then hiding it.

    • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ve got the top end latest Pixel model and it did not cost me 4 digits. Bought one used, so Google never got my money. Immediately put grapheneOS on it, this phone in its pre-gOS spyware form never had access to my actual data in the first place. Or even a real network.

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I bought a refurb Pixel 7 on eBay for like ~$150 and put Graphene on it. It’s not like you have to spend four digits unless you want to.