• samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Banning religion has been tried, It doesn’t work. Banning the awful things that religion makes people do is a better option.

    • Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Authoritarianism comes in many forms. Didn’t any of you read 1984? I mean, don’t waste your time - there’s way better materials to learn from, but Thought Police, anyone? Also, no idea why you’re getting downvoted. You atheists are dogmatic as fuck. I’m an atheist. Hey, let’s ban Islam. That’s how you sound.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are multiple countries who have already banned orginized religion.

      It is the next step of human society.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          North Korea is basically the only one I could find.

          And they execute religious followers… Among other things.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            china restricts evagelization and missionaries, but doesn’t outright ban religion.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              China doesn’t ban organised religion. It even has a state church. China is paranoid in general, and an effect of that is they just like to keep religious followers where they can see them. In a way, literally, churches there are kind of like a compound (not a security compound) where they hold meetings and worship and house missionaries and stuff.

              It doesn’t ban evangelisation or missionaries per say, but mainly foreigners. Part of this is a concern with foreign interference (which to be fair, the USAID was recently exposed for sending money to Christian organisations abroad so the American megachurches can gain influence there.)

              It’s not ideal for Christians, but it’s nowhere near what @SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world was suggesting as “banning organised religion”.

              If anything, China can be seen as preferring organised religion to unorganised religion

            • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              If you can’t learn to copy/paste into a sewrch engine then you are going to keep failing to know things for a long time.

              I don’t fucking care enough to spoon feed you, you’re an adult act like it.