• Cryan24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is the epitome of could vs should… could a single pilot fly the plane ( given the technical aids available these days and in ideal conditions)… Yes, Should they… absolutely Not… lack of redundancy and too many opportunities for things to go wrong that could be avoided by another set of eyes.

          • CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Which I am, because pretty much everything leads to death eventually. I’m not a super being that can calculate the number of deaths directly resulting from an airplane flying in a given day.

        • Etterra@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          When the traffic density for planes is the same as the traffic density of cars within say 100 miles of airports, then I’ll take that statistic seriously.

          • friendlymessage@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 hours ago

            What an odd thing to say… “If conditions would be completely different the statistics would be different, therefore I don’t trust the statistics”. What’s your point exactly?

        • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          The difference here is that pilots are rigorously trained and go through constant continuing trainings and recertifications, while someone who wants a driver’s license effectively needs to prove they have a pulse and can read at a second grade reading level (at least here in the US). If we actually cared about road safety, we’d raise the bar for a driver’s license.