• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    if it doesn’t apply to all citizens it cannot apply at all

    The conservative response to this has always been “The law does apply to all people. One Adult Man, One Adult Woman is a universal rule for all marriages.” The libertarian attitude of “Get government out of marriage” doesn’t work in this regard, because marriage is a legal compact with a host of downstream consequences.

    Marriage is a political institution. It cannot be depoliticized, only reformed in one way or another.

    • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      One Adult Man, One Adult Woman is a universal rule for all marriages

      A conservative would ask you why the woman needs to be an adult?

      Again, the only real answer is you have an adult citizen who wants to form a contract (because marriages are a social and/or religious concept) with another citizen. Done.

      Exactly what you said: it is a legal contract with downstream consequences (well not really if you dont want to bother with it at all, but I digress). A legal contract. You cannot pick and choose who gets to make contracts, because if you do, they really have no legal basis.

      Red heads cant sign contracts with left handed people. That is where you will end up.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        A conservative would ask you why the woman needs to be an adult?

        Sure. There’s plenty of variation in their deplorable beliefs.

        A legal contract. You cannot pick and choose who gets to make contracts

        State legislatures have enormous latitude in deciding the validity of contracts. It’s one of their fundamental roles.