• arrow74@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    If it gets incorporated into the soil then some will stay there. Plus many landfill designs prevent decomposition entirely

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Well yea, but they claim the point is that it’s not going to need to end up in landfills because it biodegrades. Meaning at best it’s carbon neutral, but that’s unlikely unless only renewable energy is used it produce it in the first place.

      Don’t get me wrong, it sounds miles better for the earth than making more microplastics, but it’s not much more than that, and not some kind of panacea.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        but they claim the point is that it’s not going to need to end up in landfills

        No they didn’t. They claimed it is biodegradable. It can be composted if your local trash collection service separates garbage that way, but most don’t. Just because it’s biodegradable doesn’t mean you can just chuck it outside

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I didn’t mean to imply chucking it outside was the plan, but I do have a compost pile for food scraps and from what I’ve read it’s better for methane production to compost locally than to add biodegradable materials to landfills. So presumably the idea with creating this type of plastic is to reduce landfill usage as well.

          Isn’t the big excitement that this plastic can biodegrade in relatively normal soil conditions? As opposed to the industrial composting facilities that are necessary for PLA and other corn based plastics?