• goat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    i mean if you want to bring up Palestine losing two separate wars and thus losing their land, and Hamas refusing every single peace treaty (even though the West Bank accepted the terms), feel free.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bruh are you calling what’s going on in the West Bank peace? These people are the victims of an explicit genocide campaign.

      • goat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. I said that West Bank accepted peace treaties but Hamas refused them every single time, thus ending the treaties.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ll engage just in case, but yeah this is very wrong. First, until 2006 the West Bank and Gaza were under one government, so the idea that the West Bank alone accepted any terms is very interesting, to say the least. Second, Israeli bullshit peace offers are too many so just say which one you want and I’ll explain why it was bullshit. The only exception was the Oslo accords in 1993-1995, but those fell through when the Israeli PM was fucking assassinated by a Zionist and replaced by Bibi, who called the whole thing off.

        • TheDankHold@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The West Bank isn’t ruled by Hamas, they have zero presence there. You have a very limited perspective on this.

            • TheDankHold@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hamas can’t refuse a treaty for a territory they do not rule. Your argument is still ridiculous on its face.

                • TheDankHold@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why is Hamas affecting a treaty between two parties that aren’t Hamas? You keep restating the premise but you haven’t justified why your premise is valid. The reality is that Hamas is a great excuse for Likud and the Zionist coalition to push for the one state solution they want without as bad of a pr storm.

                  • goat@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Because at the time, while the Palestine Government operated in Gaza, they didn’t actually hold power inside of Gaza. No, Hamas controlled Gaza and was in close contact with Arafat during the Accords.