• barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not what they ruled on so of course they didn’t. They also didn’t call it not a genocide.

      What they ruled is that South Africa’s case has enough merit to warrant a preliminary order, meaning that it is possibly, but not necessarily, a genocide, “It is not obvious that there’s no genocide going on”. The actual verdict will take years to reach as it requires establishing intent and everything, not just “civilians are dying and Israel could and should do more to prevent that”.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, they had much more information than an average internet user has and that’s quite different conclusion from what majority users on this board would immediately jump without any doubt that Israel is committing genocide.

        More over, it did not say that “Israel could”, i.e. it did not say that it did anything incorrectly. only that “it should take all measures within its power”.