I can’t believe some of the points Linus made against the Fairphone, especially given he’s onboard with the same compromises for the Framework laptop. 🤭

  • Phanatik@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not even that. It’s that his review isn’t an objective assessment of the product because he stands to financially benefit from Framework doing well. He’s worse than a hypocrite, he’s a shill.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      he stands to financially benefit from Framework doing well.

      I don’t understand what one has to do with the other?

      One is a laptop, one is a phone, they don’t compete with each other.

      • Phanatik@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m talking less about the products and more about Linus’s reviewing practices. We saw this in the watercooler debacle. He half-asses reviews and blames the product when he’s the one messing up.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you want to say he is not always a good reviewer, that’s a fair position, but not what we’re discussing. We’re discussing an alleged conflict of interest.

      • thomas@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        They both have the same goal of reperability and the same shortcoming (being way more pricy than competitors with the same performances). Buy one gets roasted and not the other.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          One has to make significantly more compromises than the other due to the form factor. Again, these are not comparable devices.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        He reviewed the framework. He invests in it. That makes him bought and paid for. He doesn’t become a new person each time he reviews a product, his history exists regardless

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          That makes him bought and paid for.

          LOL no it doesn’t?

          He doesn’t become a new person each time he reviews a product, his history exists regardless

          You don’t have to “become a new person” to understand that this product does not compete with the one he invested in. If there was another laptop reviewed that was the same repairable/upgradeable ethos you might have a point.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            You don’t seem to understand the concept that if a source is biased, then they can be unreliable in areas outside of their known bias. It’s not hard though, really.