ruffsl@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 年前Programming languages personified - leftoversaladleftoversalad.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1216arrow-down110
arrow-up1206arrow-down1external-linkProgramming languages personified - leftoversaladleftoversalad.comruffsl@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 年前message-square42fedilink
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down3·edit-21 年前JS, at least, deserves it.
minus-squareTherouxSonfeir@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 年前How do you feel about TypeScript
minus-square🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down3·1 年前U can try and polish a turd if ya want.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-21 年前Better. Of course, it’s just built over top, so you can still get JavaScript issues in TypeScript, and it’s not necessarily going to be obvious. This is particularly an issue if you call JavaScript libraries, which I’m told is standard practice.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前A more polished unholy list of depencies?
JS, at least, deserves it.
How do you feel about TypeScript
U can try and polish a turd if ya want.
Well, what TYPE of turd is it? ;)
any
You better catch that.
Better. Of course, it’s just built over top, so you can still get JavaScript issues in TypeScript, and it’s not necessarily going to be obvious. This is particularly an issue if you call JavaScript libraries, which I’m told is standard practice.
A more polished unholy list of depencies?