Two decades of U.S. policy appear to be rooted in a mistaken understanding of what happened that day. archive

  • kbin_space_program@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    This isn’t new. Also, this is a false narrative that the invasion of Iraq was ever about retribution for 9/11.

    It was started because the Dubya administration insisted that Iraq had WMDs and implied that Saddam was planning on using them relatively soon

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not even that… W. had been planning to attack Iraq on day 1 because of the failed assassination plot against his dad.

      • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        That was Bush’s motivation. Cheney recruited him to be President while Cheney was head of Halliburton.

        Halliburton made a metric shit ton off all this shit.

        Cheney was WAAAYYY more involved in policy - especially geopolitics - than previous VPs.

        Once W realized that Cheney was a lying sack of shit, he was banished from policy, but that wasn’t until almost the end of the second term.