• Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is like saying the intention of driving is killing kids on the street because it happens.

    I feel misrepresented. The harm caused by road construction and driving is not intended, but accepted. It’s part of the whole package, which is the part which is intended.

    Animal industry is paying for murder and abuse

    I feel we’re running in circles. I thought that part was settled, while it was never disputed in the first place. Let’s stop here.

    • Vegoon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel misrepresented. The harm caused by road construction and driving is not intended, but accepted. It’s part of the whole package, which is the part which is intended.

      Do you think we could say the same if kill a worm by tiling the soil for plants? as not intended but accepted? That is the hole point, it is accepted side effect. But the killing of a cow is the main goal in the animal industry, not a side effect.