• el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Isn’t the average life expectancy caused by infant death? Anyone living through pubity probably had a good chance of living to 70.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          The average age going up appears to directly correlate with the heightening of the definition of adulthood.

          If humans could live to 1000 we would call a 600 year old dating a 40 year old a pedo

          • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            In 1885 the legal age of consent in the UK was raised to 16. The average life expectancy of adults had barely changed.

            So while this disproves your correlation theory, it’s also important to remind the reader that correlation is not the same as causation. Society, the role of government, the rule of law and its encroachment on personal choice changed hugely from the 13th Century and 17th Century - I would therefore claim that society would not have been accepting of paedophilia in the 13th Century despite the lack of law.

            Sexual desire of prepubescent children has, as far as I know, never been considered the norm.

            • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              According to random internet person you are incorrect. Though I have not fact checked this much your comment sounds extremely improbable.

              https://genealogy.stackexchange.com/questions/1595/what-is-the-earliest-age-a-boy-in-england-could-get-married-in-the-1800s

              'You will find a lot of confusion in the discussion of this legislation on the web. My understanding is that, while they did introduce an element of parental involvement in approving a marriage, the Acts left the accepted minimum ages where they were in traditional canon (that is church) law. So it was possible for a girl to marry at 12 and a boy at 14. Even if the parents disagreed with the decision, there were perfectly legal ways in which the marriage could take place.

              And we are still all teaching teenage “kids” about sexuality and “experimenting” is totally fine. Do the sex thing “kids”! As long as they do it with other “kids”…

              As for the rest of the Euro moral high grounding I don’t know which history books you have been reading but marrying young and the monarchy was a rather popular combo. Plenty of kings with brides even younger than 9.

              Even now our leading Elites enjoy private Epstein island visits filled with girls not considered legal age.