nytimes.com
www.nytimes.com

The State Department said Israel needs to take more steps to improve the situation among Palestinians. The United States had given the country 30 days to meet aid criteria.

The State Department said on Tuesday that it did not plan to decrease weapons aid to Israel, as a 30-day deadline set by the Biden administration passed without the country substantially improving the humanitarian situation in war-devastated Gaza.

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III had warned in a letter dated Oct. 13 that the United States would reassess its military aid to Israel if it failed to increase the amount of aid allowed to enter Gaza within 30 days.

The letter said that the humanitarian situation for the two million residents of Gaza was “increasingly dire” and that the amount of aid entering Gaza had fallen by 50 percent since April.

By law, the U.S. government cannot give aid to foreign military forces deemed by the State Department to be committing “gross violations of human rights.”

MBFC
Archive

  • Saleh@feddit.orgEnglish
    386·
    12 days ago

    But i was told repeatedly, that Biden/Harris were only toeing the line bc. of the election and once it was over, they would change things?

    Turns out the whole ordeal was yet another piss poor maneuver to lie to the people, just like that “aid pier” that ended up being used for IDF instead.

    Biden and Harris will do nothing to stop Israel. They made a whole fuzz, now to have this very explicit “red line” not just to stepped over, but rolled over with a bulldozer. There is no red lines for this administration.

    They haven proven once and for all, that they are no better than Trump for the Palestinians.

      • shadowfax13@lemmy.mlEnglish
        101·
        11 days ago

        spineless shortsighted blue maga is the reason we are in this position and is going to get worse.

        or maybe you are part of dnc whose gravy train got affected.

      • Saleh@feddit.orgEnglish
        7·
        12 days ago

        If one party looses because of their support for AIPAC they’ll move away from AIPAC.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.worldEnglish
          18·
          12 days ago

          No, they are clowns for thinking that not voting for Harris thereby enabling a Trump victory will be a better outcome.

          May Palestine get everything coming to it that their actions enabled.

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.worldEnglish
            51·
            12 days ago

            It was the Harris campaign that made the decision to not break from Biden on Israel, at the cost of at least a +6 points gain. That’s the fault of the campaign’s calculations to ignore those voters, take them for granted, and instead run to the right with Liz Cheney and having the most lethal Military. That single policy change would have secured her the swing states needed to win the election. Biden is a Christian Zionist, the genocide and de juro annexation of Palestine is exactly what he wants.

            I voted for Harris and told others to do the same. It’s still on the campaign to earn votes to win. Blaming voters is just sowing division when we need unity and solidarity to fight against Fascism.

            Quote

            Our first matchup tested a Democrat and a Republican who “both agree with Israel’s current approach to the conflict in Gaza”. In this case, the generic candidates tied 44–44. The second matchup saw the same Republican facing a Democrat supporting “an immediate ceasefire and a halt of military aid and arms sales to Israel”. Interestingly, the Democrat led 49–43, with Independents and 2020 non-voters driving the bulk of this shift.

            Quotes

            In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withhold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they’d be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they’d be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely.

            Quotes

            Quotes

            Quotes

            Majorities of Democrats (67%) and Independents (55%) believe the US should either end support for Israel’s war effort or make that support conditional on a ceasefire. Only 8% of Democrats but 42% of Republicans think the US must support Israel unconditionally.

            Republicans and Independents most often point to immigration as one of Biden’s top foreign policy failures. Democrats most often select the US response to the war in Gaza.

            May Palestine get everything coming to it that their actions enabled.

            The United States Administration is the one enabling Israel unconditionally. What a gross way to justify the genocide, by blaming it on the people who are anti-genocide.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.worldEnglish
        113·
        12 days ago

        Your whole movement wants/needs to learn about politics and human behavior.

        You expect blind loyalty and obedience in support of your beliefs and values but refuse to be anti genicide…

        What would have Biden and Harris lose if they stopped the genicide in Palestine? Would they have lost Republicans votes? How about Zionest votes? How about the Evangelicals votes? No. So they told millions of people Arab, Muslims, and Far left people to fuck off and then want to cry about what? Not being liable in the genicide? That our genicide was more just because it was going slow?

        Every Arab and Muslim coalition in the DNC warned them that if they didn’t change course on Palestine they wouldn’t get Arab and Muslim votes. So who’s fault exactly?

        • Maalus@lemmy.worldEnglish
          8·
          12 days ago

          I don’t get this either. Like, they tell people to vote Harris, despite her having a shitty pro-genocide policy. Instead, she could’ve said “enough”, stopped the genocide, and I could be telling people to suck it up and vote for her despite her being against genocide. Which world would be a better place? Of course the one where Palestinians get to live.

          But apparently that’s something that’s unthinkable

          • NatakuNox@lemmy.worldEnglish
            9·
            12 days ago

            Yup all these train track memes and people complaining about Arabs and Muslims not supporting their values, while automatically assuming the Palestinians will be killed regardless.

            Like there was nothing to lose and everything to gain if Harris had a left facing platform. But they told their base to go pound sand… After voting for them of course.

    • Don Escobar@lemmy.worldEnglish
      316·
      12 days ago

      There are already talks to annex the West Bank, they are about to find out how friendly trump is to Muslims, I mean they did hop on stage and endorse him…