• Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    26 days ago

    I find this theory so absurd, i am quite sure it comes out of some psyops organization. The main thing that resembled some of Russias former glory as SU was their nuclear arsenal. And believing they would let all of it go unmaintained to the point that no relevant amount of nukes would remain working is just nonsensical. Hanging on to that arsenal must have been one of Russias top strategic priorities.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      It’s really not, brain drain, collapse of the ussr, cost to maintain, etc. all of this is why many in the west believe that the stockpile is in ruin. The kursk sunk because they didnt maintain basic torpedoes, what makes you think they have the knowledge/money to do that with nukes. Russia has clearly shown it’s a paper tiger.

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      26 days ago

      Even if the nukes are unusable and Russia is bluffing… I’d not be too keen to call the bluff. You just have to assume they are not.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      26 days ago

      Is it?

      The oligarchs has stripped the military of everything they could, replacing armor with paper crap and the such.

      Now take nukes, which are notoriously finicky and require a boatload of maintenance to remain explodable, if that is a word… If ever used, it’s the end of the world, and it won’t matter anymore.

      So here you got weaponry you can quite easily siphon millions out of and basically no one will find out, or no one will be left to care.

      Do you really think they did their best on those?

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        25 days ago

        We’re also talking about a military that had an endemic of soldiers getting sick and going blind because they simply would not stop drinking the rocket fuel. Their flagship carrier is basically a littoral ship because that’s all it can do without catching fire. I assume they still have some silos with missiles that could launch and make for a decent dirty bomb but primed and functional warheads…unlikely

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      When you, a corrupt general, get your annual $10 millions to take care of 50 nuclear warheads, that will never ever be used, what will you do?

      • KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        26 days ago

        The care of the warheads is typically done by some central organization, rather than every individual missile base. Its really specialized work, and it doesn’t make sense to have teams capable of performing it at every base.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          26 days ago

          It was just a metaphor for corruption, you are right but the corruption could take place in the centralised organisation, everything is centralised in russia.