The Trump administration has begun flying undocumented immigrants from the US to a military detention facility at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said on Tuesday.

Leavitt told Fox Business Network that at least two deportation flights were “under way”, but gave no further details.

Her comments, however, appeared to confirm reporting by the Wall Street Journal, citing an anonymous official with knowledge of the operation, that about a dozen immigrants were onboard one flight from Fort Bliss, Texas. The newspaper said an additional flight had departed on Monday.

CNN later reported one of the flights had “about nine or 10” people onboard who were detained in the US without valid immigration documents.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Isn’t that what jails are for? in USA you have a ton of those I hear… if these people were guilty of anything, surely there would be zero trouble charging them (specially in the Kangaroo Military courts of the USA). Once convicted you can put them in any jail of your liking

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes, and keeping these people safe in US federal prisons was going to be difficult. Many of them would have been murdered/assaulted due to how poorly the US manages the prison system.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So instead they are kept uncharged and untried forever in Guantanamo??? where they are nicely safe and comfortable and not being tortured at all? for THEIR safety? got it

        • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          “Because placing them in Guantanamo meant no one had to actually figure out where/how to house these people safely.”

          I refer you back to my initial comment

            • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              No you don’t get it. They did this because the Bush administration didn’t want to confront the problem of potentially innocent people being murdered so they did nothing and other administrations chose to continue with that.

              Sure these people should have been housed in the USA but can you imagine how few would live to see trial?

              • Jhex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                No you don’t get it. They did this because the Bush administration didn’t want to confront the problem of potentially innocent people being murdered

                If this was their concern, why didn’t they just let them go? take them back where they took them from? after all, they didn’t have enough evidence to even charge them

                Side note, you should really check your reasoning here bud. You are literally arguing that the USA, in an abundance of care for the safety of certain people, they took them and left them to rot in a concentration camp for decades…

                • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  They grabbed people ostensibly from battlefields. They aren’t collecting evidence in a firefight. This isn’t a cop tv show. Theoretically battlefield combatants do not have the rights you seem to think they do.

                  You should check your reading comprehension. I said they left these people to rot out of an unwillingness to confront the issue. Placing them in US prisons would mean most would be killed or harmed so instead of trying to resolve the issue the administration kicked the can to the next who did the same.

                  If you think Im defending this choice you are mistaken.

                  • Jhex@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    42 minutes ago

                    They grabbed people ostensibly from battlefields. They aren’t collecting evidence in a firefight. This isn’t a cop tv show. Theoretically battlefield combatants do not have the rights you seem to think they do.

                    I do not know what rights you think I think they have… but they do have some rights in International Law, not that the USA cares but they do.

                    Also, if all it takes is for someone to be in a “battlefield” to be automatically a combatant, well, it only shows your very American view of the world when you have never fought on your own soil. These villages, some of the poorest places on Earth, are the battefields. Where did you expect these people to go? their summer houses while the conflict passes? maybe take a sabatical from gathering dirty water from the only river while the solutions fixes itself?

                    If you think Im defending this choice you are mistaken.

                    Fair… my point against your line of thinking is that I would bet my left nut there was less than zero consideration for the safety of the detainees… In fact, the #1 reason they were put in Guantanamo to begin with was to “respect” somewhat the USA constitution, you know back in the good old days when they were at least pretending the constitution meant something