• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    This seems like a bad idea.

    What sort of protections are in place against nefarious actors that gain access to this network? Do they do anything to isolate each connected device from each other so that two devices on the network cannot connect to each other, such as making use of subnets? Are users connections throttled, and if so, to what degree? Are certain websites blocked to prevent potential malicious actors from intercepting sensitive data more easily, such as bank sites?

    I mean, the idea is a well intentioned one, but I can easily see this going very wrong very quickly.


    Me: Expresses concern about potential cybersecurity issues with a free publicly joinable network

    Lemmy: Furiously downvoting

    Honestly, I am not sure what I was expecting, but it was clearly too much.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      As a service provider, you’re not legally responsible for what others do on your network.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If your bank credentials can be intercepted that way, then the bank had poor security. They’re not responsible for that anymore than any other ISP.