empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoKash Patel Is Polygraphing FBI Staff to Find Out if They’re Being Mean About Himwww.thedailybeast.comexternal-linkmessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up1724arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1717arrow-down1external-linkKash Patel Is Polygraphing FBI Staff to Find Out if They’re Being Mean About Himwww.thedailybeast.comempireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square103fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaretoppy@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·3 days agoIs polygraph test reliable ? Doesn’t it fall under pseudoscience ?
minus-squareThat Weird Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoIt’s more of an anxiety-detector. It has no basis in fact.
minus-squareAnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·3 days agoIt is not reliable at all, and yes, it is widely considered to be psuedoscience. Yes, this is a batshit insane scenario
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 days agoYes, morons still believe in it, yes, he is a moron. That and just looking for an excuse.
minus-squareKorhaka@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoIt measures things accurately but this has absolutely nothing to do with identifying if someone is telling the truth or not.
minus-squarePeer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·3 days agoYou can even train to beat them, so it’s definitely not a reliable method.
minus-squarekent_eh@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoAnd, I would assume, if anyone had done that training it would be FBI agents.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoLol right? This seems more like a “can you beat a polygraph test” test, than a loyalty test
Is polygraph test reliable ? Doesn’t it fall under pseudoscience ?
It’s more of an anxiety-detector. It has no basis in fact.
It is not reliable at all, and yes, it is widely considered to be psuedoscience. Yes, this is a batshit insane scenario
Yes, morons still believe in it, yes, he is a moron.
That and just looking for an excuse.
It measures things accurately but this has absolutely nothing to do with identifying if someone is telling the truth or not.
You can even train to beat them, so it’s definitely not a reliable method.
And, I would assume, if anyone had done that training it would be FBI agents.
Lol right? This seems more like a “can you beat a polygraph test” test, than a loyalty test