Source.

Yep, PHP is turning 30 this year! Wondering if “PHP is still relevant?” Ever since we have been hearing that PHP is dead. It was “dead” 10 years ago, 5 years ago, and “is dead” today. But somehow - it isn’t. Anyway… happy birthday!

  • Decq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Let’s be honest though. The early PHP versions were absolute dog shit. And the definition of how not to design a programming language. That said, that never stopped anyone in web development from using it apparently. No clue what modern PHP looks like, apparently it’s better now.

    • kingofras@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 day ago

      Was not intended as programming language. The name literally stands for Hypertext PreProcessor. It was meant to be a script injector for HTML back when the internet was still fun.

      Then it got out of hand and PHP didn’t evolve fast enough to be a web technology leader, but never ceded the position of old trusty workhorse, and still powers a significant part of websites.

      • Decq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I somewhat know the history of PHP and how it came to be. And that it was just a personal project that suddenly got big. So I don’t blame the creator. But that still doesn’t make it a good language.

      • kernelle@0d.gs
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        OOP programming in PHP is pretty fun, keeping up with it’s deprecations and vulnerabilities is not

    • thesystemisdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Modern PHP is better because it’s modern. Which early version of a programming language was good? I’ve used a lot of them, and by modern standards, I think dog shit is a somewhat appropriate description for most of them.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s one of a plethora of scripting languages from the '90s which were designed to be the antithesis of “fail fast” and kept going no matter what.

        I guess what with C/C++ being the Mainstream Option at the time, not having to deal with a strict compiler must have felt like freedom. As someone who has had to maintain, cleanup and migrate ancient PHP code, I call it folly. That mindset of “let the programmer just do whatever and keep trucking” breeds awful programming practices and renders static analysis varying degrees of useless, which makes large-scale refactoring hard to automate which is just amazing when your major versions aren’t even remotely FUCKING BACKWARDS COMPATIBLE.

        PHP’s original design is just fundamentally atrocious. It became popular in large part because unmaintainable code is usually someone else’s problem.

        A language that I would definitely use for server-side rendering and that was already good from its first stable release is Go. It was thoughtfully designed and lends itself really well to static analysis, while still being easy to write and decently performant.

      • Decq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        It’s been about 20 years since I’ve touched PHP. So i don’t remember all the problems i had with it.

        But some language from those times were at least consistent with itself and clearly more thought-out. Even though they might miss some of the nicety we’ve come to like nowadays. Of course for web development there weren’t many better choices back then.

        But I’m heavily skewed towards non-oo, static typed, explicit languages so PHP was probably never for me.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      IMHO the killer feature was mod_php. Writing server-side website logic was stupid easy with that. I think if it weren’t for that, php wouldn’t have been nearly as popular.

      I quit using it like 10 years ago, but I’m happy with what I did with it and got from it.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      When I was using Ruby (some Rails, but mostly Sinatra, for little web apps and api serving) Laravel was coming up in PHP shops. Which was just trying to be Rails running on PHP from what I could tell.

      There were others before that, like CakePHP, but all I remember about that of all the bugs my coworkers dealt with. I was strictly a front end dev back then.