• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 个月前

    The authors approach to not owning anything digital was to attempt self hosting. But the authors reaction to the amount of work was that he shouldn’t own the “self-hosting”? He does not even realize that he’s back to not owning anything

    • elDalvini@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 个月前

      He proposes the cloud be owned by communities, so in a way by everyone. That’s not the same everything being owned by private companies.

      • NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 个月前

        So is he insinuating that communities should have IT people who keep things running for everyone (like a digital librarian of sorts)?

        Because that takes time, effort, and money. Like a lot more than one would spend or need for just themselves/family/maybe a couple of friends.

        Also, community-run self-hosting just seems like a bad idea from a privacy and legality standpoint. One pirate getting caught isn’t usually so bad (usually a warning or small fine). But once you start distributing, then you’re going from a kiddie pool of consequences into an ocean of consequences. We’re talking massive fines and/or jail time.

        Edit: I should clarify that I’m not talking about services here, but content itself.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 个月前

          The point is that clouds aren’t inherently bad, and actually come with a lot of important upsides; they’ve become bad because capital owns and exploits everything in our society, poisoning what should be a good idea. The author is arguing that while there’s nothing fundamentally wrong with self-hosting, it’s not really a solution, just a patch around the problem. Rather than seeking a kind of digital homesteading where our lives are reduced to isolated islands of whatever we personally can scratch from the land, we should be seeking a digital collectivism where communities, not exploitative corporations, own the digital landscape. Sieze the means of file-sharing, in effect.

        • Max@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 个月前

          There’s so much to host that isn’t related to pirated media sharing though. I host like 5 services and only one could be related to that. I know you clarified that you’re talking about content, but there’s also so much content that isn’t related to pirating either. Like most of the fediverse for example