• Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    For one thing, local governments don’t always have the authority to make these changes — at least not without jumping through some hoops. State laws often require local communities to perform engineering studies to justify a lower speed limit.

    This is one thing I’m running up against. The main road that bisects my community is a state highway, five lanes wide with a speed limit of 45.

    Children are bussed across the street from the school because it’s so unsafe to cross. The walk signals are barely long enough for an able-bodied person to make it in time, let alone the elderly or children. And there are cars turning while you attempt to cross.

    But I can yell at my local government - of which my dad is a part - all I want and they’re helpless to do anything because it’s a state highway. And I’ve told my state rep - who’s someone I know from high school - and he said there’s no way he could do anything because the legislature would never vote for less highways.

    • sga@piefed.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      would it not be cheaper to atleast have a few footover bridges, or under the road ones instead of bussing people.

        • sga@piefed.socialM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          i am sorry, but what! foot over bridges can be made in months, if not weeks. they are not that complex (just lots of metal rods on either side of rod, and middle truss are manufactured externally, just shipped and bolted). there is a possibilty, that we may be having a language gap (though we both speak english, we may use different words), so i would request you to please check if these are sufficient for school’s needs - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Footbridge

          the wiki page disadvantages list cost, but that is considering we take care of accesssibilty, and install elevators or escalators. but simpler ones can be built under $10,000, if you go all metal and glass decks, that would double or triple.

          where i live, these are fairly common, and used on almost all major roads. We are densely populated, so not everyone can have cars even if they have financial means, because all roads would be choked.

          • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I know what you mean, and it’s a good solution for some places but it’s too crowded along the highway to put one up without having to deal with eminent domain, and we’d need four or five of them to handle all the places people cross.

            And honestly it would be solved much cheaper and easier with changes to signage, signals, and lane markers.

          • sga@piefed.socialM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            additional note - wiki’s images on fist half of page are mmostly weak wooden or natural aided ones, but lower down there are modern designs. take for example the one over train tracks (though less wide than your highways i am guessing, but take it as an example). They are simple enough, and you would only have to get highway’s permissions mostly to ensure that height is enough (usually highways have a height limit, something like 20-30 feet (2 or 3 storey building)). now most people are not willing to go 2-3 floors, so escalators are common. so “small tunnels” are more convinient. just imagine these bridges, but under ground and upside down. now assuming the beneath of road is reinforced, you just need to dig like 10feet below, and you are good to go. they are more expensive when built after building roads, but still can be built under 100,000