• GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It appears that you’re the one who didn’t read my response. “Not all men are sex offenders but almost every sex offender is a man”

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      …so you’re just ignoring their question to substitute your own. Very nice strawman, but it does appear pretty malicious at this point.

      • GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Question posed: “So all men are sex offenders” Answer given: “Not all men are sex offenders but almost every sex offender is a man”

        It’s a literal direct answer to their question. Perhaps English isn’t your native language?

        • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Nah m8, you right. Somehow repeatedly missed your last statement. Sorry for the snarkiness.

          I saw the “almost every sex offender is a man” part, but i missed you actually answering the question somehow. Genuinely sorry

          Edit:seriously thats wild, im guessing i got hit with a serious case of assuming