• deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A strange turn of phrase in the headline. Consider… “A derailment due to interference by authorised persons”.

    • SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a relevant distinction.

      Interference by unauthorized person’s = outsider threat.

      Other possibilities could be intentional malicious actions by authorized people (insider threat), or a mistake by authorized people (human error, incompetence, negligence, …)

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right on.

        It’s just that I’d have expected those synonyms to have been used in the headline.

        Though thinking about it some more: maybe the vagueness is actually more correct if it’s unknown if the interference was deliberate.

        I suppose it’s a small mercy that the headline wasn’t “unauthorised interference on Russian railway, you’ll never guess how many cars detailed”.