alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoTrain with 19 wagons derails in Russia due to interference by unauthorised personswww.pravda.com.uaexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1153arrow-down11
arrow-up1152arrow-down1external-linkTrain with 19 wagons derails in Russia due to interference by unauthorised personswww.pravda.com.uaalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoA strange turn of phrase in the headline. Consider… “A derailment due to interference by authorised persons”.
minus-squareSHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoIt’s a relevant distinction. Interference by unauthorized person’s = outsider threat. Other possibilities could be intentional malicious actions by authorized people (insider threat), or a mistake by authorized people (human error, incompetence, negligence, …)
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoRight on. It’s just that I’d have expected those synonyms to have been used in the headline. Though thinking about it some more: maybe the vagueness is actually more correct if it’s unknown if the interference was deliberate. I suppose it’s a small mercy that the headline wasn’t “unauthorised interference on Russian railway, you’ll never guess how many cars detailed”.
minus-squareRaxiel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoUnauthorized persons discover this one weird trick. Fat controllers hate them!
A strange turn of phrase in the headline. Consider… “A derailment due to interference by authorised persons”.
It’s a relevant distinction.
Interference by unauthorized person’s = outsider threat.
Other possibilities could be intentional malicious actions by authorized people (insider threat), or a mistake by authorized people (human error, incompetence, negligence, …)
Right on.
It’s just that I’d have expected those synonyms to have been used in the headline.
Though thinking about it some more: maybe the vagueness is actually more correct if it’s unknown if the interference was deliberate.
I suppose it’s a small mercy that the headline wasn’t “unauthorised interference on Russian railway, you’ll never guess how many cars detailed”.
Unauthorized persons discover this one weird trick. Fat controllers hate them!