• davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 年前

    Serious answer: Posits seem cool, like they do most of what floats do, but better (in a given amount of space). I think supporting them in hardware would be awesome, but of course there’s a chicken and egg problem there with supporting them in programming languages.

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      Posits aside, that page had one of the best, clearest explanations of how floating point works that I’ve ever read. The authors of my college textbooks could have learned a thing or two about clarity from this writer.

    • Kodiack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      I had the great honour of seeing John Gustafson give a presentation about unums shortly after he first proposed posits (type III unums). The benefits over floating point arithmetic seemed incredible, and they seemed largely much more simple.

      I also got to chat with him about “Gustafson’s Law”, which kinda flips Amdahl’s Law on its head. Parallel computing has long been a bit of an interest for me I was also in my last year of computer science studies then and we were covering similar subjects at the time. I found that timing to be especially amusing.