A top Hamas political official told The Associated Press the Islamic militant group is willing to agree to a truce of five years or more with Israel and that it would lay down its weapons and convert into a political party if an independent Palestinian state is established along pre-1967 borders.
The fact that you are accusing me unprovoked of being angry at you leads me to believe your intent in this dialog is to try and make me angry.
Perhaps in your mind anger is the correct response when somebody lies and misconstrues, but you are ignoring the fact that I expect that kind of behavior out of Pro-Hamas accounts.
Nah, homie, people going “you don’t know me or my beliefs” are clearly upset at being called out on their behaviour online, thats why I said you’re angry.
Still claiming people you don’t agree with are pro-hamas? Pathetic.
Telling you your presumptions about me are wrong makes me angry?
I don’t know, man, I think you are mistaken, but you can’t be told nothing, so I guess just keep pretending your life away?
And I believe our dialog started because you took my anti-Hamas stance to mean I was pro-genocide. So I’m just mirroring your own behavior, which yes, I do agree has been pathetic.
No, but that’s not what you did.
Interesting, as the only claim I made was that you’ve made exclusively pro-israeli comments in this thread. There’s objective proof of that, so like, no?
*Anything. And I can be told whatever you want to say. Will I respect and accept it? Probably not.
No, it’s when I pointed out that you’d only made pro-israeli comments while being as unfair as possible to the Palestinians.
Learn to read usernames or you’ll look even dumber, dude
What specific comment of mine was “pro-Israel”?
I will wait.