• psmgx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You call it overblown and disapprove… But then keep posting the questionable source.

    This is how you get bots to pick up links, and how you start rumors.

    • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think them being upset about an actor being uncomfortable always being sexualized is overblown.

      I think the parts about him harassing women are fine.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No they are not fine in any sense. If they are true, they are awful, but in order to prove them, we need a better source. A PRIMARY source. Some corroborating evidence. Give us something more than 3 layers of hearsay which would be beyond inadmissible in court.

        Although you are reciting a source, your source is so indirect and unproven that you’re basically dancing on the line of defamation (although of course no one could give enough of a shit to sue).

        If you alledge those things, you better have a good reason and at least a handful of evidence. Otherwise you are doing a disservice to every woman out there trying to prove awful allegations, because she has to fight all the mistrust you are building up.