They line up in front of a courthouse in southeastern France, from morning to evening, and have gathered in the thousands in cities across the country. They hold signs reading, “one rape every six minutes,” “not all men but always a man,” and “giving in is not consenting.”

They chant: “Rapist we see you, victim we believe you.”

Women across France are rallying in support of Gisèle Pelicot, a 72-year-old reluctant icon whose husband is on trial in the city of Avignon for systematically drugging her and inviting dozens of men, 50 of whom are now his co-defendants, into their home to rape her over nearly a decade.

The shocking case has sparked what many women in France call a long-overdue reckoning over “rape culture” and systemic sexism in the way the judicial system handles sexual violence.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Then maybe you should understand that women rape men as frequently as men rape women:

    And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011).

    In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding: that women rape men as often as men rape women.

    Now consider: how many women do you see convicted and jailed for rape?

    crickets

    That’s the sound of massive gender bigotry in play, right there - 50% of all cross-gender rapists getting away Scott-free, purely by virtue of their gender.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      His point is that is not what the article is about. It’s off-topic.

      I get that you’re passionate about getting your point across but it’s swamping the discussion a bit.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        It’s not off topic. If you link me to a YouTube video with a sponsor that really sucks, I’m gonna talk about how that sponsor sucks. You can’t just tack on some garbage and be all “just ignore that part, it’s not up for debate.”

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          I understand that it melts discussion but every thread on this post is about that aspect, and that’s frankly a bit much.