Summary

Vladimir Putin responded to Ukraine’s US-backed ceasefire proposal by imposing strict conditions, including a halt to Kyiv’s military aid and mobilization, while continuing Russia’s own rearmament.

His calculated stance prolongs negotiations without outright rejecting Donald Trump’s initiative, which seeks to end the war while pressuring Ukraine.

Putin also demands Ukraine’s demilitarization, exclusion from NATO, and recognition of Russian territorial claims.

Trump, with limited leverage, may shift toward aligning with Putin’s terms. Meanwhile, Ukraine fears the ceasefire could allow Russia to regroup and intensify its offensive.

  • alkbch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Total destruction is what happens if you don’t concede.

    • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      In this case total destruction happens even if you concede. That’s why there is no sense in conceding.

      • alkbch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        No, actually total destruction would be avoided if Ukraine concedes now.

        • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Well very obviously no. Russia is offering nothing. Very specifically no guarantees, they want to prevent them getting weapons and prevent them going into any military alliances. That’s total destruction of Ukraine.

          And that is something that their opinion leaders have always claimed is the goal.

          Ukraine has no other option than to fight, even if every nation in the world stops helping.

          • alkbch@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That’s not total destruction of Ukraine. Words have meaning.

            Fighting until all Ukrainians are dead or have fled or surrendered is not really a great option, is it?

            • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              You are a master of missing the point! I salute you!

              That is 100% the total destruction of Ukraine, because the only reason for wanting your adversary to give up weapons and give up alliances and pretty much give up sovereignty is to finish them at a later time. There is no other reason. Ukraine has reason to stop fighting without any safety guarantees.

              • alkbch@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                That’s not destruction of Ukraine.

                Destruction of Ukraine is what might happen if there’s no ceasefire.

                • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  So you think if someone attacks you, then says that they will only stop if you give them everything they want, plus stop resisting and not call anyone for help, that you are safe.

                  That’s insane. Nobody in their right mind would accept that.

                  • alkbch@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    No, I didn’t say any of this. Why are you putting words in my mouth?