The bullshit generators we call ‘AI’ don’t assume, and aren’t frantic: they just regurgitate an output based on as much bullshit input as we can stuff into them.

The output can be more or less recognizable as bullshit, but the computer doesn’t distinguish between the two.

…it’s always the OR. And I don’t understand how, cuz in the OR there’s always a full team of people working in tandem, so opportunities to just disappear without being noticed while fucking a coworker or patient are pretty much nonexistent.

Actually maybe that’s why it’s always the OR lol: folks fucking each other in other units just aren’t getting caught.

That or we’re just the Florida of the hospital. /shrug.

Nothing a few bullets can’t fix.

He understands what they do for him, which is to tank and rebound specific markets in a predictable way so that he and his goons can insider trade.

There was never a trade war - he doesn’t give a shit about the economy. It’s market manipulation.

It’s a dried up corpse. It ain’t sucking shit.

defining what AGI is

What AI was before marketing redefined AI to mean image recognition/generation algorithms or a spellchecker/calculator that’s wrong every now and then.

What are we going to call actual AI when AGI starts being bastardized by marketing the way “AI” was before it?

Nobody

I mean… I could name a few…

the next Fallout game.

Next one might not be a game.

That’s a good point. I wonder if there’s a way to combine the throw-wallet duress pin with the delete-everything duress pin.

Like, enter the duress pin, get the fake profile AND start a timer: if the real pin isn’t entered within 1 hr (or whatever timeframe the user set it to), then it factory resets.

Best of both worlds.

IIRC one of the mobile operating systems has a duress pin that instead of deleting all your shit, it just opens up basically a different user profile. So you can throw a few random apps and photos etc until it looks convincing, and just have that on standby. Put in your normal pin and you get the profile you actually use.

Cop demands to see your phone, and it’s just a “sure - it’s 4022” and they get to scroll through some uninteresting bs.

Go home and put the real pin in and it’s back to normal - nothing’s deleted.

It’s kinda like carrying a throw-wallet with a few bucks and expired credit cards… get mugged, hand em that, and be on your way with your real wallet in another pocket.

We’re starting to go in circles, so I’m gonna skip the bits we’ve already addressed.

There is. And that is that “there is no God”. Which also naturally follows “There is no final judgement”. And if there is no God, one could reason morality doesn’t exist. It can and has resulted to cruel acts.

One could argue that, but not well. Morality and theology are a venn diagram. Religious doctrine can be and often is a source of morality, just as well as it can be and often is a source of evil. The former is why near the start of this conversation I mentioned that if christians actually behaved as their book instructed, things would be still fucked, but better than they are today. In any case, you can find examples of atheists behaving both morally and immorally as well, the moral side showcases that the threat of hell or w/e isn’t necessary for people to behave. We have an innate sense of empathy that is enough in itself to show that morality doesn’t need some parent in the sky threatening us with an eternal spanking if we don’t keep our hands and arms to ourselves. There are also atheists who are absolutely rancid examples of a human, who may act in all flavors of greed or malice etc, in the same way you’ll see christians succumbing to those traits. The distinction -and this is the important bit- is that with christians there’s an additional source of hatred coming from their handbook, which will embolden the negative traits in those who already have them, but also add negative traits to those who otherwise would not. You stand out as a prime example of the latter: chastising racism and living the positive elements of christianity to the best of your ability; but you opened your previous post by revealing a touch of darkness directed at homosexuals. Your religion compels you to look at that group with some degree of hatred- albeit not to the extent of the other entries on that list, but it’s there. Were you not influenced by christianity, I have no reason to believe you’d be any less moral in the aspects of your life in which you appear to be solid role model; and being that you appear to be an otherwise accepting person, I am confident you’d be able to look to the LGBT community without that hatred.

Unless ofc you’re only behaving morally under the threat of a spanking from sky-daddy… and if you need to be tricked into that kind of performative morality, then you’re no better than the garbage end of the spectrum of atheists who act on that same greed or w/e without the fear of a sky spanking. Which, funny enough, is really similar to the cautionary tale of the Pharisees, which you appear to already familiar with. So far though, I don’t suspect that’s you: even considering the faults that come with your religion, you strike me as pretty admirable person overall, and the kind of person that I kicked this conversation off by lamenting at christians in general not being. My perception of religion would be very different if you were the norm.

And?

I covered that already: it paints a pretty clear picture of how christians are to think of gay people. Do you believe that homosexuality is fairly categorized into the same group as murderers, violent criminals, and slavers?

So we should love them if they are our enemies…

Should? Yes. Do? Rarely. Christians love to vote the rights away from the people scripture tells them to love. Why? Probably because scripture also tells christians to beat them to death with rocks. Which accomplishes the goal of bolstering hatred against that group while building a no-true-Scotsman scenario for people like you to dip in afterward and point to another verse and exclaim that “Oh no no no, those aren’t true christians; everything’s just unicorn farts and glitter between christianity and homosexuality, cuz we’re supposed to loooove them!” So here you are, a knight in shining armor, defending evil and feeling like you have the moral high ground while doing it. It is absolutely wild how effective that book is at manipulating people with good intentions. This is why the contradictions are so glaringly unacceptable.

So close yet so far! The whole Bible is about how we as humans are evil and need a saviour. This “evil shit committed by the church” isn’t endorsed by the Bible at all! In fact, God’s standard is perfection!

If god’s standard is perfection and he made us evil, then he is himself evil. …and the Bible absolutely endorses evil - this whole conversation is about a few of the specific examples of such.

I have seen evil committed by Atheists as well, does that make every Atheist evil and depraved?

Are you ignoring the spiel about systemic patterns and drawing attention to individuals, or is there an atheist playbook somewhere successfully convincing hordes of atheists to carry out the same types of evil against the same types of people? I’m not aware of the latter. There is no atheist dogma. If an atheist chooses to commit evil, that’s on them… atheism isn’t a cohesive group in any sense other than of the thousands of gods humans have invented, atheists believe in one fewer than you.

Yes. For example, Türkiye, the leaders often pay lip service to Islam. But if people who identify as Christians want non christian things, then populists will cater to that. Doesn’t mean Christianity is at fault. The American republican party can be the same but stop paying lip service to Jesus.

As you’ve probably guessed, my issue isn’t with christianity specifically, but religion in general. I don’t care if the user manual has a cross, star, crescent etc on the cover, it’s all the same shit; that said, I’m more familiar with christianity, as it sounds you are as well, and christianity is the veneer of choice for a hefty chunk of the evil taking place where I live, and the one that me ensnared throughout my childhood, so that’s the one I’m most vocally opposed to. Had I been born somewhere with a different regional mind-poison I’d be bitching about that one instead.

No. Because I don’t interpret the Bible to tell you to hate everyone who is sinful or different. I don’t interpret it to mean “you are better than everyone else” or “elect a fascist”. I think being a Christian means we need to act like Christ.

As did I… with a few uncomfortable exceptions that we’ve gone into great length discussing. That’s why I asked how you reconcile the disparity between the church and the book: I could not. The purpose of a system is what it does… and what it does is incite hatred, sometimes to the extent of full-blown war. It is a tool of evil like no other.

Where does it say to hate these people? The whole context of this conversation is talking about the law and addressing pharisees.

The context is a list…

the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine

It drops homosexuality smack-dab in the middle of some of humanity’s absolute worst. Even ignoring the other verse that states gays should be murdered with rocks, the one you linked paints a pretty clear picture of how christians are to think of gay people.

Irrelevant.

…how? That bit was contrasting the church against the book. The church is a function of the book. You ever heard the expression “the purpose of a system is what it does”? Kinda sounds stupid at first, but this is the kind of thing it’s talking about, and the reason you see even memes saying things like “the system isn’t broken and needs to be fixed; it’s working exactly as intended and needs to be destroyed.” The evil shit committed by the church is the result of the instructions from the lore. So, hard disagree - it’s 100% relevant.

“Red” to me means leftist. But I assume you’re an American and talking about the American Republican party led by Donald Trump.

You are correct.

Pedantry

Naw that was a good distinction. We seem to be online around the same time, so I assumed you were also US, despite your instance.

Should I- someone who believes that God literally became man and died for our salvation, reject God’s gift because Karen in Mississippi hates mexicans? By no means!

Absolutely not, but back to the system spiel. I’m not talking about the occasional anomaly, I’m talking about recurring patterns, entire communities, voting patterns. Oppressive regimes have always had a cheat code to win elections, and that’s be catering to christianity (in areas where christianity is the dominating religion… we could pretty well copy and paste this entire conversation subbed for islam or w/e if you wanted). It’s the same us-vs-them shit every time. So should you- someone who believes in god, reject that mythology over the realization that it compels people to do evil things, consistently and frequently? That’s up to you. I did. I’d at least encourage you to reject the evil - by which I mean the human element, the church. Cling to the book if you must, but advancing the church isn’t doing humanity any favors.

How do I feel about the current president of the United States of America? I believe he is an evil antichrist and he along with those who idolise him need to repent and turn to Jesus before it’s too late for them.

antichrist… he certainly checks a lot of the boxes. I can say with a pretty high degree of certainty that the folks here won’t be repenting in any meaningful way. Trump is their god; Jesus is just their mascot. …I’m not convinced it isn’t already too late for us.

An indentured servant is not comparable to a sex slave 🤦

You don’t think so? Feel free to elaborate on why. Of the three random atrocities I listed, sex slaves are the most comparable in my opinion. I almost didn’t even use that example because it’s too similar to a laborer slave.

And I show you a bit of the Bible which condemns enslaving people after you claim it is promoting slavery because it is apparently silent on the topic,

That is another lie. It’s clearly not silent on the topic - I never claimed it was. Please don’t put words in my mouth - they taste funny.

and you just say “contradiction!” Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

Yeah, that’s how contradictions work. Ya starting to see why I’m not a huge fan of them?

I’ve read the Bible before I started going to Church full time. There’s nothing in it telling you who to vote for. Or to hate groups of people.

You literally just linked a verse instructing you to hate on homosexuals in your previous post. Did you forget? As for other groups, how do you reconcile disparities between what scripture instructs vs how the church acts? There’s a heavy red lean in christian voters despite Christ’s teachings largely boiling down to things decried as ‘woke’ today. Why is the modern culture surrounding christianity so blatantly at odds with the lore of christianity?

My family has a mix of religious belief or lack thereof. I really doubt that would happen, considering my beliefs differ from my parents, and I have a sibling who is even a different religion.

Good to hear. Having conversations like this with an internet stranger always makes me a bit nervous - I’d hate to be the catalyst for a situation that devolves into domestic violence. I don’t know the social situation of the person on the other end.

Masters, do the same to them, and stop your threatening, knowing that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and that there is no partiality with him.

Doesn’t sound like Trump/Epstein, knife wielding, or bombing gazans behaviour to me.

Ah, right. I forgot to give the follow up instructions for Trump to give his sex slave a nice pat on the back for a good sloppy finish, the knife murderer clean your corpse up nicely for the funeral, and Israel to send some ibuprofen to the hospital they just leveled. Surely that justifies the preceding act!

It is not possible, nor has it ever been possible, for a slaver to treat a slave with respect or dignity. Making sure to feed and water them regularly and give a smiley “good morning!” every now and then isn’t going to justify keeping them as a slave. Suggesting that is does is - drumroll - promoting slavery!

the law is not laid down for the just, but for the… …enslavers,

First of, if fucking only. Legality and morality are very frequently at odds with each other, slavery being a prime example, and a great illustration of why the opener to that verse is absolute bullshit: slavery was legal. The holocaust was legal. Manifest destiny was legal. That doesn’t make any of them ‘good’.

And second, a contradiction in the Bible?! Dude those are a dime a dozen. Nice to see it called out as a negative in another section I guess, but being ambiguous about it isn’t the same as condemning it. To the contrary, I’d wager that shit is by design: if it was too overtly evil people wouldn’t follow it… gotta bake in some plausible deniability. …and even that has the cherry on top of hatred for homosexuals in the same sentence by lumping them in with murderers and slavers.

I said earlier that the Bible advocates for some evil shit - that was an understatement. It’s really good at advocating for evil shit. So good at it that the people it tricks into carrying out the evil shit think that what they’re doing is somehow moral or even benevolent. It’s got evil down to a science. There was a time when I fell into that trap too. I get it. You think you’re doing good. Take the contradictions like the one you highlighted as proof of inconsistency. And dig. There are a an absolute ton of them in scripture. If your only exposure to it are the verses your preacher is spitting at you, you are NOT getting the whole story. Read it yourself. Consider the implications on your life of each statement it makes. Consider what it’s compelling you to do to others - and I don’t mean some vague ‘love thy neighbor’ shit, but specifically how are you being taught to think about different groups of people, or whether you do things like vote against or in support of those people. …and be careful when you start to find things that make you uncomfortable or start to think critically of the religion: it’s a closed community that doesn’t respond well to dissent, so if you say the wrong thing to a religious authority figure or even family member you could find yourself in a violent situation with all of your current support networks rugpulled from beneath you. It’s fucking terrifying.

Hadn’t even considered that - I figured it came down to size constraints or the anatomic changes of the fetus.

Crazy. I wonder if that’s something we could influence.

Yeah it’s super tight squeeze even in normal conditions from a skeletal perspective. Pushing much past 9mo would guarantee a c-section.

Frozen embryo. Meh.

I thought this was about extended gestation at first, which is something I’ve always wondered about: is the whole 9-months thing driven by the baby or the mother? Or more specifically, is 9 months the optimal amount of time for a baby to be in the womb?

Like if we manipulated the hormones / blocked the whole pressure-oxytocin feedback loop on the maternal side to just keep the mother gestating for… 12 months? 15? 3 years?? Would the ‘newborn toddler’ have a hyper-developed brain? Or just a normal brain that lost out on the first 3 years of critical life experience?

If our incubation tech was good enough to fully replace a biological mother… 20 years? …there’s a dystopian sci-fi writing prompt for ya. …or like, the key to super humans.

Or, would shit like the foramen ovale on the fetal side of things just close off anyway and put it into a birth-now-or-die situation?

That is a lie. Acknowledging that it’s happening is addressing it. Addressing the slaves directly and telling them to be obedient is promoting it.

The Bible does the latter.

Put those instructions in any other context: if I told the kids trafficked to Epstein’s island to give Trump the best blowjob they could, would I be addressing pedophilia or promoting it? If you were being chased by a man wielding a knife, and I told you to stop running and just let him stab you to death, would I be addressing murder, or promoting it? If I told my political representatives to keep sending bombs to Israel for them to continue turning Gaza into a crater, would I be addressing genocide, or promoting it?

The Bible advocates for some evil shit.