They want to diagnose women who take Tylenol while pregnant with TDS. Previously RFK Jr said he wanted to put people with mental illness - which he claims TDS is - in camps.
They want to build camps of pregnant liberal women. Do you think they will let them keep their babies? I doubt it.
TIL all Jews are autistic
As a Jewish person, yes
If this is a round about way to banning genital mutilation except for doctors reasons then I guess they can have this one.
I admire you for having this much blind optimism after the last ten months or so.
No, they can’t, because they’re only gonna apply it to trans people even when they do have doctors okaying it
I know a lot of folks are against circumcision, but my old boss was 78 and had to be circumcized cuz the sheath lost its elasticity and he couldn’t pee and yea that’s an old person issue but man. I’m just glad they did it when I was too young to remember. He was not a happy camper
I know a lot of folks are against circumcision
As far as I know, people are against forced circumcision. It boils down to mutilating someone, usually a kid, preemptively for… reasons. I don’t think anyone care about medically mandated procedure.
Sure, but the same can be said about pretty much anything. If I were to get bone cancer in my left arm, I’d rather have had it amputated when I was a baby than today. Recovery always sucks.
Kellogg gave me and most American men autism I guess
Is there EVER a time when Republicans AREN’T thinking about the dicks of children??
Yeah, wheen they’re defending female youth sports. They need to check the locker rooms in case there’s any secret children’s dicks ah god dammit nevermind
Tricky one, tricky. It’s very doubtful but maybe it’s possible for them to do that when they are busy raping little girls…?
At this point there should just a a bot that posts the billy madison points gif automatically whenever either of those two chuckfucks is mentioned.
Has Tylenol sued the Trump admin yet? This can’t be good for their sales.
Honestly, anyone who is influenced by this absolute bullshit was probably already taking horse dewormer or pet drips behind the neck from the farm/feed store anyway.
Nah, their patent on acetominaphen is expired, so they have little real interest in defending it today. Slap another brand on their various meds that don’t contain it, and call it a day.
They’re still constantly using their brand name, rather than the generic chemical name. I think they’d def have grounds to sue.
I agree they have grounds, but I was approaching it from the angle of if they would bother, or need to for that matter.
Trump is as friendly with big pharma and the big corpbrations as any politician - behind closed doors he’ll likely say or do anything to keep them happy, and they know it. Their lawyers may contact his lawyers, but we’ll likely never hear of it unless both sides decide to leverage legal/political theater to their mutual benefit somehow, at the taxpayers/consumers’ expense.
It’s about time we get paracetamol here in the States. It’s much more effective and has a charming accent.
I wouldn’t know, but I hope you’re right, categorically.
People who believe the administration and drop Tylenol for Motrin, Kenvue is happy either way.
Also they continue to own the brand that is demonized by the administration that some people will stick with precisely because this administration demonized it.
Also reap a bump of people stockpiling because they think the government might take it away.
People who believe the administration and drop Tylenol for Motrin, Kenvue is happy either way.
I mean, when the profits for all of those drugs funnel to the same company…
This wouldn’t be “defending it” like a copyright claim. This would be suing for damages. It doesn’t matter how much they care about the brand. They’d sue to get money based on a loss of potential sales (future and present) and any other harm done.
I could see them not wanting to rock the boat, but I don’t think it’s a smart play. They’ll go down either way if the Fascists want, and they clearly don’t care about them enough to not damage them.
They are saying Tylenol, not acetaminophen aren’t they? What typically happens when you defame a brand?
You get sued out of existence for damages.
This case? The supreme court made the president untouchable as long as it can be claimed as an official act, and he said it during a white house press conference so it will be deemed an official act.
So after their entire legal department quit rather than be associated with a case against the supreme leader, they’d find an ambulance chaser to file the lawsuit and trump would look at them like south African diplomat from leathal weapon 2 and say “presidential immunity” then the FDA and CDC would launch health and safety inspections and the IRS would audit the company and every employee from the CEO to the janitor in Booger Hole, WV.
Your question is the kind of thing I expected to find out with my own comment, but the answer barely matters when it comes to whether they will take action or not. Either way its their product originally, something they invented/discovered.
Probably doing great from panic buying.
Thank you for this information Children’s Penis Expert RFK Jr.
I mean I’m all for ending circumcision, but being a fellow acetaminophen-american, I can certainly say it does not appear to be a factor for me being that I’m not cut.
It seems very strange that lacking foreskin would have a relationship to executive functioning in the brain, but I’m not an expert like they claim to be.
You have been found in violation of the following political pre-crime:
- Applying logic, reason, and/or critical thought to a claim made by god-emperor Trump.
Your online activity is under review by the Defense Information Coalition to Keep Bitcoin Under Tactical Trade (DICKBUTT) agency. A recommendation will be provided shortly by Grok regarding the severity/lethality of action that will be taken against you. Please stand by for a final decision.
You may mitigate these charges by committing to a monthly one thousand ($1,000) dollar donation to the Trump campaign or affiliated parties to include Vladimir Putin, Benjamin Netanyahu, Kim Jong Un, or any local chapter of the Ku Klux Klan, Proud Boys, or Fox News.
Smaller infractions may be rectified by meeting a daily quota of telling slurs to minorities in person, over the phone, or on your preferred online social media platform.
Thank you for your cooperation,
In Jesus’ name, amen.
Is this a copypasta or AI generated? It’s several orders of magnitude better written than basically every Lemmy comment I’ve ever seen.
OC, baby!
…but feel free to steal it / change it / use it as a copypasta, idgaf
DICKBUTT 💀
They say men think with their dicks, but I thought it was a metaphor!
There’s conclusive evidence that male Trump supporters think stunted thoughts, so draw your own conlcusions from that.
So if you take too many Tylenol, you become Autistic and your foreskin drops off. Cool trick Bro! Now do Diphenhydramine.
No no, it’s when you get circumcision and then rub Tylenol on the wound… right?
I showed this to my autistic friend. He laughed so hard I thought I broke him.
You didn’t break him, the Tylenol and circumcisions did! It’s all in the article. Try to keep up, bud.
Ngl I thought this was a stroke headline. These are a whole bunch of unrelated topics strung together in a sentence with Elmer’s glue.
No, Elmer’s doesn’t have enough fumes. I think it’s rubber cement they’ve been sniffing
Weapons grade modeling glue that they stopped selling in the 80s.
Pretty sure I developed a brain bleed from that title sentence.
The woke Trump administration again persecuting Christians and attacking their rites
Most Christians don’t do the dick chop, it’s a US and Jewish thing (maybe Muslim too?)
It’s quite common among Christians in the u.s. Probably somehow related to Kellogg and Graham, of cereal and crackers. Those types were obsessed with preventing masturbation and pleasure.
Back in the 70s-80s many Christian Americans were circumcised because it was thought to be cleaner. Doctors would often just do it once the baby was born with little to no input from parents.
That’s fucked up. It’s still fucked up if the parents ask for it. My body my choice and all that.
Not in the US. About 80% are circumcised in the US, including most Christians.
To give some perspective on why this is the case from an American, it isn’t that a bunch of parents are asking / going out of their way to get this done, it’s that the doctors almost always offer it with the justification that it’s a preventative measure against infections, and the parents generally don’t question it due to how commonplace it is already. The cultural reasons that started this haven’t been popular for decades and it’s only the medical establishment that’s keeping this going.
That figure absolutely staggers me. The fact that it’s so commonplace to irreversibly mutilate the genitals of a baby that has no capacity to consent to such a lifelong alteration really says something. Conservatives being up-in-arms about trans kids taking hormone blockers to prevent puberty but not about taking a scalpel to babies’ penises would be genuinely baffling if I didn’t already expect that without double standards, they’d have no standards.
Yep. Blew my mind when I learned about it, too. Unfortunately it’s not unusual or even difficult for these people to hold two completely incompatible opinions at the same time. I should add that female genital mutilation is not commonplace in the US. It doesn’t make it better, just less horrible.
I guess I meant an inclusive and, meaning Jewish or US American, but it would have meant an either or situation there.
Where I live, chopping dicks is predominantly a Jewish thing, and is the butt of many Jewish jokes. Personally, I’m anti-baby-dick-chopping.
US thing = American Christian thing = American thing
