

- Nestle, Part 1: Bad for your Food
- Nestle, Part 2: Bad for your Water
- Nestle, Part 3: Bad for your Shelter
I’m also on Mastodon as https://hachyderm.io/@BoydStephenSmithJr .
Employment is a necessity under Capitalism. Performance is not.
I agree. I don’t really see any problem with her performing the play.
BUT, I’m not sure the library should be forced to let her use the space (or be assessed civil penalties). So, I don’t think she should sue or that the suit should go her way.
I could be convinced if the library is supposed to be providing performing space to the public and the library is controlled/funded by the government. Then, I think she might have free speech protections, especially after they had done some scheduling. Asking her to change the characters definitely seems like content policing, not mere “time and manner” control.
Living in the sauna that is Arkansas, I don’t usually think about dry air, but I think you are correct. If you’ve dehydrated yourself through breathing, plain water is fine for hydration.
If you can have food that is an electrolyte source with your water, that’s fine.
If you consumed the food prior to the dehydrating events, it won’t assist in restoring electrolytic balance.
Tap water has too few electrolytes to restore your electrolytic balance after losing water (via sweating or urination). But yeah, it does technically contain electrolytes.
Yes, all the ways in which human lose water they also lose electrolytes (“salts”). More with sweat, but still some with urine. So, re-hydrating should include at least some of those. This has been known for decades, tho ravers often forget it and have died from hyponatremia.
When I started it was more of a walk (2.0 mph; 30 minutes), but it still wore me out.
Now, I do a 7min mile on Wednesdays, try to get my 5k @ 2% incline down to 28 minutes on Satruday (did ~32 minutes yesterday), and try to get a 10k in under the “club limit” of 1hr on the treadmill on Sunday (did 6.15 mi. in 1:02:00 [2 minute cooldown] today).
It’s the best way to get my recommended weekly cardio I’ve found.
Don’t kill the part of you that’s cringe, kill the part that cringes.
– Kabona Drawfee
Same… and my back no longer hurts after I started running. The back pain actually went away before the weight did.
The mitochondria are the powerhouse of the cell.
The article mentions the technique worked on most (differentiated) skin cells they tested on, in addition to working on (undifferentiated) stem cells.
But, there’s a lot of steps between this article and any sort of treatment, if I understand correctly.
It might be easier to just edit the gametes before they form a zygote at all. That would also make consent for treatment much clearer.
“The un-fur-tunate fellow”
The “anaphalaxis” I was talking about was the alternative to the sub crush, and what happened to the billionaire that is the subject of the article, so I think you might have misunderstood me?
Bee-igi.
Based on the simulations I’ve seen, yeah. I’m sure there were plenty of panic in the sub and during the anaphylaxis, but I believe once the sub failed, there was less than a second between in first physical sensation to the complete disorganization of the nervous system, rendering the sub death quite painless. With anaphlaxis, even a sudden, sever attack, there will be several minutes of (at least) muscle strain as your diaphragm desperately tries to pull in more oxygen, and also general pain as your tissues squeeze against one another as they expand and nerve cells die.
I can and have accepted death; I’m too old to believe radical life extension will save me. But, many deaths are incredibly painful. If I have a choice on how to go out, inert gas asphyxiation seems best, but some sort of rapid disorganization isn’t too bad. Anaphylactic shock seems worse.
It’s like intraoffice e-mail.
That’s why Elmu wants to go to Mars.
Honestly, I don’t like either programmability approach (vimscript/lua OR emacs-lisp), but I’ll probably just stick with neovim, because when I’m on a system without my configuration, I’ve more productive there, and I don’t want to learn enough emacs-lisp “APIs” to reproduce my somewhat small vim configuration.
So, I think probably everyone in the thread is “correct”, but you are actually talking past one another.
I think the JS behavior is a bad design choice, but it is well documented and consistent across implementations.