• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m shocked this is going through. I gotta imagine at least Tennessee will block it. They’re super pro-big isp.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Okay, going off the title to start with you’re building a WiFi network, that’s very cool (I’m guessing it’s a mesh network), but will you connect it to the Internet too?

    That’d be more of a headline if so, then just building a WiFi network.

    • TheHalifaxJones@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      My friend has been using NYCmesh for a couple years now. He has nothing. It positive things to say about it.

      • Lycist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Many many good reasons. Intranets are a thing pretty much everwhere.

        Mostly for documents and resource sharing. Perhaps its a way to connect locally to a library and its resources without the vileness and enshittification of web2.0 getting in the way?

  • meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I hope they are aware of https://freifunk.net/ and don’t start from scratch completely. They’ve been doing that kinda stuff for over a decade and have developed a modified OpenWRT version and maintain lists of compatible routers

      • meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Ah nice! :D Yeeeah just thought it’d be a shame to not utilize existing work that has been done on OpenWRT. But then again, it’s highly unlikely that actors from similar groups haven’t met at hacker conferences, GitHub repos, etc.

      • meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeeah it kind of fizzled out, that’s true. In larger cities it used to be useful sometimes because of abysmal cell coverage and shady public WiFi. That has improved a lot since then, so yeah nowadays it can’t hold a candle to 4G/5G mobile data.

  • axh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I am old enough and geek enough to be bothered by the use of the word “WiFi” instead of the Internet or just network.

    It’s only WiFi if you connect the wireless router at the end.

    Edit: just noticed mention of the “antenna at the roof” on the page, but I still don’t think it’s WiFi, “WiFi” is a name of the technology that allows wireless access by multiple devices. I think it’s rather radio communication between the router and the access point. They basically use radio waves instead of the cable, it was often used in rural areas in my country, where putting cables would be too expensive.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 hours ago

      WiFi is a specific protocol, IEEE 802.11 (with a lower case letter at the end for the version). There have long been hobbyist and commercial methods for using it with point-to-point links. There are some other wireless methods for this, like LoRa/Meshtastc, but they tend to be slower and less developed. Everyone prefers using WiFi.

      So, yes, they are using WiFi in a point-to-point way. The antenna is directional to give it (potentially) several miles of range.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That I cut a bit of slack for, because prior to the minicomputer let alone the microcomputer, the CPU would likely have been a large component like the whole system is for a desktop PC.

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Language is so weird these days…

      Everything is “app” nowaways

      A .exe install on windows is “app”

      A reddit account is “app”

      Buying a phone plan and inserting a sim card into a phone is “activation” of a phone

      Lol

      Its a windows program or software

      Reddit is not an “app”, its a platform.

      You’re not “activating” your phone, your phone is already usable, all you did was purchase a voice/data plan and inserted a sim card. “Activation” is a apple internet lock thing, totally separate.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m old enough and nerd enough to be slightly peeved that “community built” isn’t hyphenated (“community-built”).

  • ryanvgates@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Does anyone know what other cities are building similar networks? Or how to get started doing it in your city?

  • dash_jackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m so down for this, especially in condominiums. The challenge is navigating the regulators since they’re often staffed with loyalists to the big ISPs.

  • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I wish I had that near me, but unfortunately I don’t live in New York (United States), I live in New York (United States).

    ARGH PLACENAMES

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Reminds me of the time I shared my Internet with my friend who was in another apartment. We just created a Wi-Fi bridge with dd-wrt. That was 15 years ago.

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Way way long ago I remember when I lived in Portland that they tried this, it was a pilot program. Idk if it’s true or propaganda but it didn’t work out because it was slow down because of how much porn people where downloading, so they didn’t expand it and just stoped doing it.

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I heard about some city (NYC??) that has public wifi access points with the terminal thing that acts like a touch screen computer for people to browse the internet. And people were allegedly watching porn on it, like in public on a busy street. So they disabled the touchscreen computer thing and only left the wifi access point on.

    • nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I was just thinking about ricochet while perusing the thread. Ricochet was new when I was starting in IT and I can still remember connecting a ricochet modem to a company laptop and then pulling up our novell netware file share over our vpn. It was jaw dropping to see it at the time. Amazing how far we’ve come since then.

  • zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Reminds me of Wireless Seattle, that must be what, 25 years ago?

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    So no Internet when it rains?
    Sorry but this idea strikes me as it’s just not gonna work.

    Like I don’t even get it - NYC probably has many competing internet providers.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    This seems like a bad idea.

    What sort of protections are in place against nefarious actors that gain access to this network? Do they do anything to isolate each connected device from each other so that two devices on the network cannot connect to each other, such as making use of subnets? Are users connections throttled, and if so, to what degree? Are certain websites blocked to prevent potential malicious actors from intercepting sensitive data more easily, such as bank sites?

    I mean, the idea is a well intentioned one, but I can easily see this going very wrong very quickly.


    Me: Expresses concern about potential cybersecurity issues with a free publicly joinable network

    Lemmy: Furiously downvoting

    Honestly, I am not sure what I was expecting, but it was clearly too much.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      As a service provider, you’re not legally responsible for what others do on your network.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If your bank credentials can be intercepted that way, then the bank had poor security. They’re not responsible for that anymore than any other ISP.