Valve have added a new rule to the Onboarding guide for game developers, noting that payment processors get a say in what stays on Steam.

Newly added rule is:

Content that may violate the rules and standards set forth by Steam’s payment processors and related card networks and banks, or internet network providers. In particular, certain kinds of adult only content.

Diff of the new terms https://github.com/SteamDatabase/SteamworksDocumentation/commit/fddd59b5395cc3c1c74574650dbf5784612d0521

:/ payment processors strike again (slippery slope etc)

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    The anti-porn religious lobby just destroyed the livelihoods of thousands of pornographers

    Beyond Pornhub, the anti-porn lobby is calling for all credit card companies to stop taking payments from all porn sites. Jessie Sage, sex worker and co-founder of the Peepshow Podcast, and I discussed the effects of this crisis on laborers—a subject she unpacks with sex workers on her newest episode. Jessie told me, “I believe that this will have ripple effects on our industry that extend far beyond Pornhub. Mindgeek [Pornhub’s parent company] is the largest company in the industry, and if Visa/Mastercard is willing to pull its financial services from them, the smaller companies are not far behind.”

    OnlyFans founder blames banks for ban on porn

    Stokely also said UK-based Metro Bank had closed OnlyFans’ corporate account in 2019 with short notice and highlighted how many sex workers, including OnlyFans creators, were struggling to access basic financial services.

    “JPMorgan Chase is particularly aggressive in closing accounts of sex workers or . . . any business that supports sex workers,” he said.

    Why is OnlyFans letting financial companies lure it away from porn?

    But the decision to remove OnlyFan’s most popular product was not a result of legal pressure, according to the company. The decision was made in order “to comply with the requests of our banking partners and payout providers,” an OnlyFans spokesperson wrote by email.

    The change marks a growing trend where financial services firms such as credit card and payment processors effectively decide what content is allowed or prohibited on internet platforms. For creators who depend on internet platforms for their income, especially adult performers, the sudden change represents a cautionary tale as the gatekeepers of the creator economy take shape.

    There’s the reason. Anti-porn/religious groups will lobby payment providers and bans to stop payments being made to adult content creators. Is there problematic adult content on Steam? For sure. However, there is also problematic political content on Steam which seems not affect banks/payment providers interest.

    We all should care cause adult content is the first to get censored. Then the censor bar will move to include other topics and more topics.

  • megopie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 day ago

    I really don’t get why payment processors care. like, I really doubt it’s a morality thing for them, so where’s the financial incentive?

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They are USAian. Owners are most likely conservative and Christian --> imposing their values on others through money. It’s the rich people’s way.

      • megopie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Every payment processor on steam is a publicly traded company, not privately owned. So it wouldn’t really be up to any one individual’s moral preference about such things. Personal preference would only count in to it if one of the shareholders had enough shares to push the board around, but the only one where I could see that being the case would be PayPal from people like Theil and Andreessen. Like they’re both jack wads for other beliefs, but I wouldn’t exactly call them bible thumpers.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I doubt that it has anything to do with social preferences of anyone internal to payment processors. They won’t care.

        Putting pressure on payment processors is a useful way to put pressure on any commercial service. The commercial service may operate in another country, but it needs the payment processor, and the payment processors don’t want to be ejected from countries. The payment processor can be a lever for laws passed elsewhere.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know how much truth there is to it, but one compelling reason I’ve heard is that adult content has a considerably higher chargeback rate than other content, making the risk much higher for payment processors. This makes sense - I could absolutely see some horny person buying some adult content, getting off to it, then doing a chargeback in their moment of introspection.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sure no one will miss those incest games, but letting payment processors decide what speech people are allowed to exchange is nuts. These are middlemen. They don’t need to exist. I want more countries to hurry up and adopt GNU Taler and make all these middlemen superfluous.

  • Couldn’t they just restrict these games to be purchased with steam wallet credit only? You can’t buy a porn game on a card, fine. But you can top up your account with €50. Afterwards, the payment processor is out of the equation.

  • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    I really hope the EU will step in to stop this, it’s a despicable practice, and it makes me sad that Valve doesn’t stand their ground. They’re big enough that they should be able to exert pressure on Visa and MC, who seemingly push this forward the most.

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    If Steam or someone went to crypto just to kick the processors out, that might be one thing that would actually make me look at crypto with something other than derision.

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They’d never do that, as it would severely limit their userbase. Throwing out a couple games, especially when it’s ultra-niche stuff like “futanari incest” games, is the much easier and more sensible move for Valve.

    • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That was originally one of the intended purposes of cryptocurrency, or at least claimed to be. Too bad we can’t have anything without needing to make it an investment engine.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Huh? Investment people definitely didn’t wait for that classification to start turning it into a speculations market. The SEC actions were largely reactive.

          My local bank’s investment and wealth management bros were already all about crypto long before regulations.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Gov can’t really do anything about it. Bitcoin was designed to be gov agnostic. They can tell you it’s illegal but there’s also really no way for them to know (if you’re not dumb).

          Hell there are entire unregulated black markets on the dark web.

          Also with the orangutan in chief being something of a crypto grifter himself, it’s not likely to be regulated at all.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Crypto isn’t necessary (or rather, blockchain isn’t necessary). Check out GNU Taler. So far I believe only Swiss banks have adopted it.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      They accepted BTC for a while but stopped. The other comment here mentioned the transaction fees being a problem for purchases on the scale of steam game prices, but it wasn’t just that. A big problem was crypto volatility and transaction processing time. They found that very often by the time a transaction cleared the value had swung enough that they were getting amounts that failed to align with the actual prices of the games people were buying.

      It’s more stable now, so maybe that would be less of a problem, but I feel it highlights a big problem with crypto in general and that is that even when you do find places that accept crypto nothing is priced in crypto. It’s basically always just a proxy for USD using whatever its current market value is.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Stable coins exist to counter that very problem. There’s several out there that are pegged to the value of the dollar, and are mostly used as intermediaries when trading between other coins.

        USDT is one such option.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I spent ages buying games on steam with Bitcoin years ago. They dropped it when transaction fees got bigger than the game cost (I don’t think they ever supported crypto other than Bitcoin, and that was through a specific payment processor that took the Bitcoin and gave Valve real money).

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well yes, this was the original intent of crypto. Putting payment in the hands of the people. It’s only been made terrible by tech bros and greed the same way the Internet has.

    • That’s what Backpage tried to do when the cc processors pulled out. The owners of Backpage were at some point charged with money laundering among many many other crimes. The years of legal battles that started in 2018 drove one of them to suicide. Would not recommend.

      • ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Backpage is very different than Valve. Backpage execs were directly involved in the pimping of minors, this were proven in court.

        I don’t believe Valve execs are pimping minors through Steam.

        • No, they were not directly involved and no, pimping minors was not proven in court. Money laundering and conspiracy to facilitate prostitution were the charges that stuck. In fact, prosecutors claiming they were involved in child sex trafficking caused a mistrial https://apnews.com/article/business-trials-3b1c9d3e59e90cd60764b3eb989fec80

          The point is not about what they did or didn’t do, it’s that if you try to go outside the system you get hammered.

        • belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Its not different because in both instances it was CC companies being anti sex.

          Realpage being a “den of CSAM” was not happening at any scale the CC companies were actively worried about and it was about defunding sex workers.

          Same deal here. This is about control and puritanism.

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh look fascism ruining things yet. Again. Can’t make steam stop doing certain things. Force it on them by giga corporations outside there control. Don’t want no diversity anywhere.

  • monogram@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That’s why you should be buying those games from itch / Patreon/ SubscribeStar, banking on a single game store is a loosing game.

    That is why EU has the DMA That is why a market is only healthy if you participate in it

    E.g. when buying coffee (except for Starbucks) I’ll go to any café that sells it, if it looks too corporate or dirty I’ll go somewhere else.

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The problem with that is that all of these platforms also use the same big payment providers, meaning they’re just as likely to be forced to remove these sorts of games.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        True. A number of Patreon folk had to go for SubscribeStar or elsewhere because they decided to ban several types of fetish

    • l_b_i@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Patreon has similar restrictions. I’m not sure about itch. They all rely mostly on stripe for payments. Stripe gets to set a lot of terms, and switching platforms doesn’t usually change that.

      • Matt@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        AFAIK Steam uses adyen for payments (at least that’s my experience every time Steam wants to verify my credit card).

    • monogram@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Wow GNU Taler is indeed the answer, it attempt to be a privacy friendly alternative to PayPal

      It’s not yet another cryptocurrency, no blockchain 🎉 no mining 🎉 no surveillance for the purchaser!

      https://www.taler.net/en/

  • Kissaki@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Diff of the new terms

    They add a <br> inside the <li>? wth

    Messy layouting

      • Kissaki@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Why would I add a line break when I don’t want or need a line break? It’s a list item, not a text paragraph.

        I define the layout and spacing in CSS for the li element.

        I don’t think I’ve ever noticed this as prevalent or common. If at all then as a strange outlier.

        If it’s a list item with line breaks, sure. But the linked diff adds it at the end of the li with no content following. And it does so on the previous li. Leading to a line diff on a to this unrelated item.

  • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Steam is banning porn games!? How will I get my Northernlion Reads Steam Porn Game Reviews content now?