• Ryktes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    As insignificant as a mid quality restaurant chain is, it just seems emblematic

    Because it’s a perfect representation of their cult behavior. Brainwashed into only caring about surface level snapshots of issues instead of actual material details.

    That said, new logo is actually trash compared to the original. Can we please just let this trend of minimalist corpo slop die already!?

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly, If they changed the logos of things but did’t gut the quality… it would really not matter.

      • Ryktes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh yeah, fair.

        I just personally hate that all major business logos now seem to just be the name on a single color background. I miss when logos had personality.

        • frunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          2 months ago

          I really think they’re finding the last corners they can cut for profit, meager as it may be. Less colors, less details, less $ to print. That’s my theory at least. Another good example of what you’re talking about is the Pringles guy: