• Scubus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Not who you responded to, but evidently someone needs to point out that you didnt read their question, or you maliciously misinterpreted it.

    Edit: nope they did actually answer the question, im just shockingly bad at reading which is very unusual for me.

    • GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It appears that you’re the one who didn’t read my response. “Not all men are sex offenders but almost every sex offender is a man”

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        …so you’re just ignoring their question to substitute your own. Very nice strawman, but it does appear pretty malicious at this point.

        • GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Question posed: “So all men are sex offenders” Answer given: “Not all men are sex offenders but almost every sex offender is a man”

          It’s a literal direct answer to their question. Perhaps English isn’t your native language?

          • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Nah m8, you right. Somehow repeatedly missed your last statement. Sorry for the snarkiness.

            I saw the “almost every sex offender is a man” part, but i missed you actually answering the question somehow. Genuinely sorry

            Edit:seriously thats wild, im guessing i got hit with a serious case of assuming