It peaked at 4.05% in March. The last 2 months it went just below 4% as the Unknown category increased. For June the reverse happened, so 4.04% seems to be the real current share of Linux on Desktop as desktop clients were read properly/werent spoofed.

  • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    7 days ago

    The combined forces of microsoft reaching new heights of greed and intrusion, plus the massive dev efforts for the best ever GNU Linux and Proton 📈📈📈

    • wiki_me@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Whats interesting is that both income , profits and the stock have been growing well for years, maybe they are just monetizing more aggressively because they can’t compete on product quality (unlike other markets that are still evolving, AI and Cloud). not a ton of stuff to improve in operation systems it seems.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        There are system dialogs that have unused space for ads, still plenty to improve!

        In all seriousness, cloud (azure) and office subscriptions blew up and account for like 70% of MS profits. They know the Windows experience is lacking, but when they already capture so much of the market and it’s such a small slice of revenue, they have no incentive to improve.

      • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        i don’t have a strong opinion on systemd, i just heard someone call it soystemd in some YouTube video once and it just stuck in my head for years

  • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    7 days ago

    In all seriousness, I think government bodies switching to Linux (UK’s, China’s, some Indian states’) attributes the most to this.

      • leopold@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 days ago

        Source? Last I checked, the Steam Deck was very much in the minority even when narrowed down to just desktop Linux.

      • wischi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        But that’s not really a Desktop is it? If we’d count mobile device we’d also have to include Android and then the situation would look completely different.

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          Steam Deck is a desktop. It is exactly the same PC hardware and software you are using on your desktop PC. It runs the same games and is software compatible. Steam Deck is a desktop PC.

          Android has a different hardware (not x86 compatible), is focused on phones, its eco system of software is not compatible with PC and in reverse does not run your PC software. Android based smartphones are not a PC.

          • flux@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            But how many use it for browsing, which I imagine this data is from?

            • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Valid point to be honest, but the answer is probably more than you think. I have a PC and still used the Steam Deck to browse the web too, not at least to install stuff. Also searching something while playing is useful too. Its made to be docked to bigger screen as well.

              While you are probably right, my point was its still a PC, because he compared it to Android. And why this is hugely different. His point was to exclude Steam Deck, because it is not a PC, just like we would exclude Android. This data from the stats probably does not make a difference if its a Steam Deck or not (nor can it tell it? because browsing is the same as on PC, its an Archlinux and regular browser after all). On the other side it can definitely tell if its Android and exclude it.

              So regardless if you think people browse the web with Steam Deck or not, this data should not be able to tell the difference between most distributions and Steam Deck, as its just a normal PC with Firefox (or other web browser) from the point of the stats. Just my assumption.

        • Bulletdust@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Connect the Steam Deck to a compatible dock and you can quite easily use it as a desktop. At the end of the day, it’s still an x64 based PC that’s just handheld.

      • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        no, the statistics are based on browser agents, very few steam deck users browse the Internet on their devices. it’s also only half the Linux devices on steam, not of all Linux desktops

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m fairly sure it’s deficiencies in StatCounter’s measurement that’s accounting for it. Statistical noise, basically.

      • doodledup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s probably even higher than that. These stats are mostly based on website visits I believe. And many Linux users are also privacy-minded and might spoof their OS in the browser. I bet a large portion of the Unknown is actually Linux too.

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s hard to tell, as there are so many things that influence it. A huge factor is selection bias, as only a small number of website embed StatCounter, and that’s very likely to not be a representative sample. I’d bet that the influence of that is magnitudes larger than of user agent spoofing.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      After seeing Garuda Linux set my user agent to Windows, I set my Windows install user agent to Linux.

      Seeing Twitch.tv login break after changing my user agent was hilarious

    • archchan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      I unspoofed Librewolf back to Firefox + Linux. That way I’m not contributing to Chrome and Windows market share and perceived dominance. Plus the more people don’t spoof, the less of a need there will be to actually spoof at all as the Linux market share increases.

    • theroff@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah me too, safety in numbers. Maybe if Linux desktop gets bigger than Windows they’ll swap it around 👨‍💻

  • Fleppensteyn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fwiw, my blog’s statistics say Linux is around 10% and I know a lot of browsers identify themselves as running on Windows when they’re not, so I wonder how it’s measured.

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 days ago

    I have had to do some work on my windows pc and I hate it. I have been away from desktop for a while now and changed to linux for personal one. At work it is all G suite, which does work to its credit, but the windows OS and microsoft cloud documents suck so much. The look and feel is clunky, so clunky. Constantly refreshing and just being shit.

    Never forgive forcing outlook.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      1980s: Hey guise, computers are now cheap and small enough that you can run an entire system and all your programs on your own machine at home instead of having to dial in to the mainframe!

      2010s: No, we’re putting it all back on the servers, you get a thin client.

        • cakeistheanswer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          From a macro economic perspective, (and im not advocating for a conspiracy, just aggregate business interest) they’re dropping energy usage so they can pay less on their electricity bills.

          So actually a double fu. get less so they can pay less rent, to provide lesser service.

          Because rent seeking is the only tech bubble left.

    • tombruzzo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I work in email Marketing and Outlook is the worst client, especially desktop. Everything I make has to have accommodations for this shitty inbox

      • Kuma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        And as a user do I hate it too. It is too many times while I edit an email and click delete that is deletes the email instead… It seems if I click a word and get the spell window does the focus always change to the list of emails… And it also force a spell correction if I click space… I didn’t pick one of the options I just want to edit the word myself!!! And if I scrolldown to remove some parts of the email thread or just want to copy a part won’t it let me if I don’t click twice… and it jumps around…damn I hate it so much. Sorry that I replied to you with all these anger. But I really felt it when I saw yours and ops comment. I hope we one day will at least think it is an ok client to work with

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        As a service outlook (microsoft mail) sucks, as a web service their page sucks andnisnpoorly laid out and optimised and the new desktop client is atrocious.

        They made me change from hotmail outlook, created a hotmail folder for under the new outlook and now I dont get notification for that address on the outlook app. If something gets marked as spam that isnt, marking it not spam sends it to the outlook inbox regardless of intended destination. If I reply to a mail it prioritises outlook despite the mail being sent to hotmail. As a result I cant log into shared files that people gave access to one but not the other.

  • 555@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Can we commit to only posting about round number percent changes?

    • Bob@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      likely content blockers preventing the trackers from working properly and invalid user agents. So i would expect about the same ratio of usage on there as well. Maybe very slightly more Linux since maybe the users are more likely to tinker with their browser configs and install content blockers, but even there Id say its an extremely slim minority of even linux users who do that

      StatCounter also sometimes miscounts when new versions of windows or macos come out. At one point (I think at windows 11 release) there was a huge dip in windows 10 users and a huge gain in “unknown” and it was quickly fixed.

    • ITeeTechMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      That 6% attributed to “unknown” is the one true OS, the only one ordained by the Almighty… Temple OS!

  • Dark_Dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    The youtuber matt from thelinuxcast sucks.

    I am regular user, i don’t code for living and my job is not tech related. I wanted to try linux and many of you guys supported and now I’m using Linux since 2 weeks its linux mint. That matt guy was so against linux mint that i thought it was shit too. But when i installed and started using it. It has been a smooth journey. Many people in linux community were helpful. But people like matt really make it for us regular guys scared to use linux. I really hope many good linux user help regular people switch to linux and increase this number.

    • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I assume the problem is hardware. Matt’s hardware didn’t work well with LM, therefore Matt thinks LM sucks… I do wish there was better hardware support but it’s the reason apple went with 1 product = 1 OS = 1 general set of hardware. Sure not every iPhone has the same hardware, but that’s why they have the model numbers, and it’s so much easier to test 200 model mixes than 2,000,000 (Android). Windows gets all the debug info sent directly to them like the others but they also have a huge stack of hardware they can use or they can buy it to test.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    uMatrix prevents me from loading this statcounter website. :-( Can’t lookup how they measure things. In the comments people assume the stats would be counted by just looking up the user agent, which is a naive approach. I don’t think agencies dedicated to stats are doing it this simple. They have way more possibilities to track and to look what browser you are using. The stats are more accurate than you probably think. They do not need to know the exact version of browser you are using, just which type and maybe what operating system you are on.

    If a script for Windows does not work on Linux and fails, then they know you are not on Windows in example.

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I am still hoping it will hit 10% market share within my life time. I remember when it was predicted to hit that in 2010, obviously it didn’t happen*. Of course for me personally, the year of the Linux Desktop was 2007 when I was finally able to use it as my main OS at home, I tried it before many times since 2003.

    * not counting systems that use the Linux kernel but aren’t considered a traditional GNU+Linux desktop.

    • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Because it’s not overly popular as a desktop os, you are far more likely to see it in certain appliances and server applications etc, none of which will show up in a pagevisits based statistic.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Less hardware support than Linux without enough substantially better about it to make it anyone’s clear preference. Which isn’t to say it doesn’t have advantages over Linux. Just that the average BSD user is going to be able to easily swallow their pride and run Linux if things went wrong with a BSD install (trust me, I’ve literally done this, these people do exist)