This new doll “enables more children to see themselves reflected in Barbie,” Mattel wrote
As a girl who grew up with type 1 diabetes, seeing these tasteless jokes in here just remind me of the shitty time kids can have when they feel different to other kids and get singled out for something they can’t control.
So what if its a gigantic mega-corp, they’re doing a good thing here for children.
Disgusting fucking ‘jokes’. Shitty people.
Kids can be cruel.
I’m glad this Barbie exists. Representation matters, and this toy is one way to show little kids it’s ok to have T1D. If a kid knows that Barbie can wear CGM then maybe the kid won’t be a jerk when they meet a new kid with a thing on their arm.
Kids can also be amazing and caring. They just need the context and understanding of what is going on. Toys like this help a lot in that regard.
Thanks for the insight! You made me change views on the tasteless jokes!
Yep, lemmy can be super ableist. It’s pretty bad.
Aren’t those with diabetes different in that most don’t have diabetes?
So are lgbt+ people, they are clearly a minority and yet their visibility is very important for the preservation or creation of their rights.
Yes, everyone is different, but normalising that difference instead of marginalising it is important.
I just meant when she said she was made to feel different because of diabetes. That in that aspect she was different
Made to feel different is a subtle way to say that she was marginalised. We are talking about school, so probably a gentle way to say she was bullied for it.
Also, she did mention getting singled out. I am pretty pedantic myself but dude, this is not the moment.
What does (or could) being marginalized mean here? I have heard it before bunch of times but don’t have a very concrete sense of it.
In school? Just marginalised can mean kids not wanting to be your friends, having difficulties forming groups for activities… All sorts of stuff that make your life harder. The word comes from the literal sense of being put to the margin, to the side, outside of the general circle.
It can easily devolve into being bullied aka made fun of for being different, kids using hurtful aliases to call you, hit you, abuse you…
Depends on where you live and all that but being singled out/marginalised can easily leave you in a position where bullies will pick on you and since you are alone, no one will defend you.
they arnt, the corporations are doing virtue signalling, much like they do with rainbow capitalism. you seem to have a skewed perception of corporations doing good, and the response to other joke is also wierd.
Wahhh, cry more.
They should make a Barbie doll that’s just been kicked off Medicare.
Not to sound ignorant but can’t you just use your imagination for something like this?
Then they can’t sell you another doll. When do we get sickle cell barbie? Like why give doll diseases? Can’t leave that up to the kid?
Right? I want aids Barbie
I guess it’s more for the “lore” of Barbie than the doll itself.
Barbie has actually had quite a number of diversity variants over the years, this isn’t all that unusual for them:
Paleontologist Barbie is pretty cool.
Meh, there isn’t even a fossil Barbie.
deleted by creator
Sent this to a D1
said “dolls are for pretend play, I would hate to be reminded of my problems when I try to find an escape”
It’s a love hate situation. For a lot of children, they will use play to process and understand things. E.g. “Helping” a Barbie with the problems helps them understand why their brother gets special treatment.
I’ve seen my daughter playing “classroom” with her teddies. It helps her understand better how school works, and what would be acceptable or not.
YES WE HEARD YOU, YOU ARE SCOTT MALKINSON BARBIE AND YOU HAVE DIABETES
TL;DR (I only have a minute right now), does this change ANYTHING about the doll except a little note on the box she comes in?
The doll is wearing an insulin pump
And it has Bluetooth connectivity to manage her A1C in the app.
And the Barbie actually functions as an insulin pump for overnight trips.
A1C is tested with a blood test, it doesnt exist on the cgm unfortunately.
Her foot falls off if you don’t take proper care of her.
From the article:
The new Barbie wears continuous glucose monitor (CGM), a device that tracks blood sugar levels, on her arm — while holding a phone displaying an accompanying app. She also has an insulin pump attached to her waist. And the doll carries a blue purse that can be used to carry other essential supplies or snacks on the go.
The Barbie’s outfit is blue, too — with polka dots on a matching top and skirt set. Mattel says that this color and design are nods to symbols for diabetes awareness.
There are several permanent modifications made to the mold of the doll that separate it from non-diabetic dolls; and insulin pump and glucose monitor are depicted and they don’t appear to be easily detachable.
The new Barbie wears continuous glucose monitor (CGM), a device that tracks blood sugar levels, on her arm — while holding a phone displaying an accompanying app. She also has an insulin pump attached to her waist. And the doll carries a blue purse that can be used to carry other essential supplies or snacks on the go.
Back in my day we just used our imaginations to make Barbie be whatever we wanted.
But now kids with Type 1 diabetes loading up their bodyweight can join in on the Barbie-borne eating disorders., because…
This new doll “enables more children to see themselves reflected in Barbie,”
💰
Back in my day we just used our imaginations to make Barbie be whatever we wanted.
and just look at the bitter asshole you turned out to be!
Yep. You can rollover to Mattel’s blatant profiteering off inclusivity hype with thehr legacy of gender stereotypes and female ideals. I’ll remain bitter and call out their bullshit.
Did you not notice you’re in nottheonion?
it’s barely any change at all and it lets some kids have fun, with the tiny upside that maybe my friend’s insulin pump won’t get mistaken for a 1990’s pager. they’re going to sell dolls anyways, why not add this accessory?
That’s clearly not the point of this entire post and why it’s been posted where it has. Have you read the article? This isn’t about what you’re talking about.
Geez. I wonder why they didn’t include all the other ones…
Computer Engineer Barbie of 2010 was great. It included a backstory of accidentally getting a virus on her sister’s computer as Barbie admits she knows nothing about computers, is just a designer, and relies on boys at her school to help. Of course the laptop was pink.
There’s so, so, so many of these all the way up to now… Oreo Barbie, the Doll’s of the World collection, the sleepover ones that have apparel that says “Don’t Eat” on it.
If it’s not clear now, Mattel relies on making Barbies that will make money at the time. So girls can be happy other girls manufactured dolls for them in factories in a country known as “Oriental”. This is the point of the post.
All you’ve done is link their public-facing marketing material which implies it works.
Type 1 is something you’re born with. Type 2 is not exclusively from overeating.
in fact i have never seen someone with type 1 diabetes who wasn’t explicitly underweight because they have to count carbs or die
Thanks, Captain.
A broad DCCT (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial) study conducted in the United States, with a population of people living with Type 1 diabetes, established that intensive insulin-based treatments (pump or at least three insulin injections per day, with a view to returning blood sugar levels to a normal range) which allowed for better control over blood sugar levels, had also caused an average weight gain of 4.8 kg compared with traditional treatments (a maximum of two insulin injections per day and broader blood sugar targets).
I have a friend with T1 that used to skip meals to stay skinny after switching to a pump caused weight gain that couldn’t be exercised off. This is what young girls do.
Are you a Mattel employee?
What are you talking about? Are you saying that Type 1 causes eating disorders? What does that have to do with what I was saying?
They’re on a crusade against insulin pumps because their friend’s disordered eating habits were triggered by weight gain from an insuline pump. This ignores the fact that people without insuline pumps also develop eating disorders, diabulimia has been a thing for decades.
Huh. That’s an interesting position. Thanks for the explanation.
No.
The topic is about Barbie.
If they’re going to continue trying to be
relevent to combat declining sales“inclusive”, they can’t be making unrealistic dolls, especially when their whole mantra is a source of women’s weight issues in society.And this ain’t their first rodeo of making insulting versions of people in an effort to market themselves as inclusive. There are so, so, so many Barbies that show a company has no idea what they’re doing but will sell anything out to flog a buck.
What does that have to do with what I was saying?
In the context of what I was saying, everything. If you were just sprinkling random facts to random comments, then nothing. Because what you said had nothing to do with what I said. Maybe you were just responding to the wrong comment all along, haven’t realised yet, and have gotten confused.
is your criticism that you oppose insulin pumps?
How could someone’s mind possibly extract that from anything I’ve said, or are you just trying to be a troll?
the post i replied to there was only about insulin pumps. what do you think about insulin pumps?
They pump insulin.
They’re inconvenient, but much better than a few years ago. Having an app for the monitor now is a game-changer to avoid people hearing a self-destruct countdown beep under your shirt. But one of my friends actually still prefers shots three times a day, You just kind of get used to that if it’s all you’ve ever known, so for some people it’s not as big a deal as others make it out to be.
So with that out of the way, you may have replied to a comment mentioning insulin pumps, but what do they have to do with the post, anymore than the doll’s hair colour?
If what you say were true, there would only be one type of Barbie.
No, there’s been quite a few now. Racist, mocking, socially damaging. It’s clear the company is led by a clueless board.
I thought it was going to be like a Tamagotchi where you had to give it a jab and make sure it has offspring, else the family line ends.
This is WOKE! CANCEL BARBIE!
-Republicans with Children who have Diabetes!
Removed by mod
Woke capitalism strikes again!
Scott malconson
i will never truly feel represented until Barbie gets a colostomy bag.
LMAO
We get Barbietis now? Aight
